• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

But What About the Guinea Pig?

Today i saw on the news that a student has successfully sued one of the universities in the area for something like $40,000. She claimed she was being discriminated against because of her "therapy animal"--a guinea pig. Apparently it was not enough for her to keep it in her dorm room; she had to take it with her everywhere she went, including the cafeteria. She needs this animal because she suffers from severe depression.

Now at the risk of sounding unsympathetic, in this case I do agree with many of the people who commented on the article and I think they have some very valid points. The first point is that if she is that emotionally fragile--as many people seem to be nowadays--what is she doing in a university setting? Seriously. I know I am treading a fine line here. I would not want to deny anyone an education or a job based on disability. However, there does come a point where one must face reality. What is this person going to school for and what does she hope to accomplish? Does she honestly think that the world will accommodate her all of the time? If so, she's in for a very rude awakening.

In fact, she may have screwed herself by her lawsuit. Yes, she did win. And whatever is left over after the lawyer gets done taking his or her share, she should invest very very carefully. Because there is a little thing called "background checks" these days. Her name is in the news now. So she graduates, applies for a job, and they do a background check and guess what? Next candidate, please! And just like that she will be passed on by. Oh, well, maybe she can use this money as seed money for another lawsuit for why nobody is hiring her. You see, employers are not legally obligated to hire anyone. They are not allowed to discriminate but it is up to the person to prove that he or she has been discriminated against. And they aren't going to go out of their way to hire someone with a proven track record of lawsuits. No, she'd better grow a thick skin because doors are going to slam in her face. Bet her lawyer didn't bother to tell her that when she filed suit. Of course not. Because he or she is going to wind up with the bulk of the money, why should he or she care what happens afterwards.

But I am really interested in this guinea pig. Someone has to look out for the poor creature and she obviously isn't. First of all, from what I understand about guinea pigs is that they can be really shy. They are not outgoing like dogs are. How is she using it as a therapy animal? Does she carry it around in a cage (bad enough) or is she holding and cuddling the guinea pig? What if IT has a meltdown, a panic attack, and escapes and is hurt? How will her fragile state handle THAT?

I have a cat who would like nothing better than for me to stay home all day and cuddle in my lap. I've often told her I should get one of those baby wraps and put her in it, then we could be together all the time. Except--even if it were allowed--it would be most unfair to her. Cats in general do not like to travel. She is better off and happier safe at home. I bet this guinea pig, if it could talk, would say the same thing. WE know what it is like to experience sensory overload; just imagine it from the guinea pig's point of view.

A guinea pig is a very small animal. And bullying, harassment, does occur in colleges as well as in high schools. Especially when there is drinking involved. How easy would it be for someone or a group of someones who had a grudge or just because to get a hold of this animal and do something bad to it? (By the way, none of these questions came up in the comments.) I love my animals. But they do not belong in certain places. And part of it is for their OWN safety.

Now, dogs have a long and valued history as service animals but not every dog has what it takes to be a service dog. The washout rate is very, very high. Most dogs that you see in training won't make it. I think the actual success rate is something like only 1 out of 10. And as I pointed out, a dog is temperamentally and intellectually different from a guinea pig. I cannot imagine how a guinea pig would do well as a therapy animal under the conditions that this person expects it to be. It's not fair to the animal and if this person had any sense of understanding she would realize that she is putting her own needs ahead of its needs.

Comments

Actually, what you describe here is the same sentiment I share for people that aren't independent but have pets. And that's not only people that suffer from depression.

My aspie friend lives with his mom and sister. And they have a dog. Why? Because his sister wanted it. Yet; his sister is way higher on the autistic scale than he is; so it basically ends up that he (or his mom) has to take care of the pet his sister wants to have around.

As for people attending University that are "unstable"... it's amongst the reasons I dropped out. Maybe I was realistic about it and figured "I can't keep up with all of this crap that comes with being a University (though college wasn't much different) student". And my school advisor told me something similar; "the real world can't accomodate you the way you want to". And clearly if I can't even put up with a diet version of the real world (cause college/university doesn't have that strict notion of professionalism a job has) I really doubt if I am a good fit.

Her future might be problematic to say the least. Employers will do these checks, but will not discriminate. It's against the law and they will not have someone pull a lawsuit on them. But in a way that's also what's wrong with employment I guess. There's a lack of transparency. Purely based on facts like your degree, other qualifications and whatnot, you should be just as fine as anyone else. Troubles of past should not be held against you. It's pretty much the same as not hiring someone who was in jail at some point (for whatever reason). It's assuming people can't change. And that mindset does worry me.

Somehow I'm convinced that if you're gonna go by the "it's your past" route, that not integrating them to where they could and should be, you're making it worse. Just looking at my jail example. Chances are someone who was in jail at some point, will most likely end up on the wrong path when he has too much time on his/her hands. Add in a notion of despair from not being hired on a constant basis and there we go again. It's how someones past will become part of the person in an overly negative way.
 
That (prior felony convictions) has been a topic of discussion in the local online news lately and the same points were raised that you make. It's a tricky call. Employers have to consider what is good for the business as a whole as well. I have personally witnessed a situation where someone was allowed basically to terrorize a whole department because the company was afraid of a lawsuit. So they put up with it and lost at least one very good person as a result. Whereas had this person not been in a "protected" group they would have been shown the door long ago. If you've never been in that situation you have no idea how demoralizing it is and certainly NOT in the best interests of the company.

What is sad about this situation with the student and the guinea pig is that all the effort she put into this lawsuit is effort that could have been and should have been (in my opinion) better used in addressing her condition. I realize that what I am saying about her could have easily been said about Dr. Temple Grandin who also had a very rough time getting her school to accept her need to use her squeeze chute when she was a student. But she was willing to work with school administration. An animal--particularly if it is not a trained service animal--is an entirely different matter. What this student is doing is not emotionally healthy either for her or for the animal and anyone who argues otherwise isn't doing either one any favor. I'm not against using properly trained therapy animals in supervised settings. But to just take an animal everywhere one goes and claim that you need it for therapy is an entirely different story. That's a living creature, not a stuffed animal.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Spinning Compass
Read time
4 min read
Views
1,540
Comments
2
Last update

More entries in General

  • Messages
    I gave it my all during today's 1:1 PT session at the gym. It was tough, but he was happy that I...
  • A trip to the woods
    A trip into the local Fens and Nine Acre Woods. Ed
  • Today's first solo gym session
    Gym session went well. Given how sore my muscles were, I'm surprised that I could do 3 sets of...
  • First solo trip
    This muscle soreness is going to make today's first solo gym session a case of mind over matter...
  • Tonight I trance
    I give an offering of some of my water each time I visit the old oak tree. Respect your elders...

More entries from Spinning Compass

Share this entry

Top Bottom