• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Civil Ear II--Will History Repeat Itself?

According to the news this morning, a bunch of disgruntled voters are in the process of gathering signatures so that Michigan and several other states can secede from the Union. I kid you not. Of course none of the big-name Republicans admit to being behind it.

As anyone from Michigan's Upper Peninsula can tell you, this is nothing new. The UP has been trying to secede from Michigan and even from the Union for decades. Probably ever since Washington awarded it to Michigan as a way of ending the Toledo War. Here, Ohio, you get Toledo. Here, Michigan, you get that pointy part of Wisconsin between Lake Superior and Michigan. Everybody happy now? Well. maybe the Ohioans. As for the two Michigans, it was not love at first sight. The Lower Peninsula groused about losing Toledo for a cold frozen land full of nothing (until they found copper and iron and other useful things up there) and the Yoopers, well, nobody asked them how they felt. And so it's been ever since. The only trouble is that the UP can't make up its mind whether it wants to be a state or a nation. Doesn't matter because neither one is going to happen.

I find this secession talk a bit ironic in light of Puerto Rico's finally having decided it would like to become a state. Uh--maybe you might want to rethink this. Are you sure you want to drag your island into all this?

In one respect it is amusing but in another respect it is not. I am sure that if you had asked the average American, north or south, about all that secession talk coming out of the southern states back in 1850 or even 1859 he or she would have said, oh, that's just big talk. Nothing's going to come of it. It's just a bunch of hot-heads. But we all know what happened in 1860 following the election of an unpopular President.

There were those who urged President Lincoln to just let "the erring sisters go peacefully" just as some are saying now. And maybe he might have listened had the South not fired on Fort Sumter. On the other hand, Lincoln had a vision for the United States and he knew that dividing it up would not be good for either North or South. Whether he was right or wrong, I don't know. But I tend to think he made the right decision to keep the nation together.

My father always said, "Don't talk loose." What is it exactly that these secession promoters hope to achieve? Sending Washington a message? They sent Washington a message in 1860 and we all know how that turned out. You'd better be careful what you ask for.

Do these people for one minute think that Washington is going to let 20 states quietly leave the Union? And if by chance, Washington did agree to this, what next? Even while it was fighting a war the Confederacy was in a hair's-breath of unraveling. There was dissention, there was bickering, there were threats of secession. In fact, that is how West Virginia came into being. It seceded from Virginia after Virginia seceded from the Union.

Do these people have any plans for a government to replace the one they want to reject? Do they have any plans for an economy? Michigan sure can't go it alone--that's why the UP has never been able to gain statehood. It's economic.

At the time of the Civil War, there were several European countries that were keenly interested in the outcome of the war. Napoleon III had just put his puppet emperor Maximilian on the throne of Mexico and was casting greedy eyes on the American South. What countries are keenly interested in the breakup of the United States today? What do they want to gain by it? What about the Mexican drug cartels currently plaguing the bordertowns? Do you think they would sit back with folded arms? And what about Al-Quaida?

Yes, it's a joke, but it's a very scary joke. Remember, we are even more connected than the United States in 1860. It's easier for crazies of all stripes to get ahold of nasty things. And there seems to be a great deal of the "end justifies the means" mentality out there these days. This country seems to be more polarized than ever and that is not a good thing. They say history repeats itself. I hope to God they are wrong and that it will not come down to Red and Blue on the battlefield. I don't want to take sides. I love my country. I love my state. I don't want to see it tore up.

Comments

I only hope Gov. Snyder can look at the bigger picture, and act decisively to keep Michigan united behind the Union. I think Michigan's success is dependent on her people's commitment to keep the state, and the United States, together.
 
Funny you should say, SpinningCompass! I live in the French province of Quebec. A huge land mass that would be one of the largest (& comparatively emptiest) countries in the world. Due to corruption allegations that led all the way to the top of the provincial gov't, an election was called. 3 parties were vying for the top spot. Ultimately, the Parti Quebecois won a minority gov't with the former 'ruling' party (the Liberals) as the official opposition. The PQ, led by Pauline Marois, are hard-line French nationalist separatists who unabashedly want to sever ties with Canada.

The thing is that most Quebeckers French, Anglo & otherwise realize that English is the international language & will remain so for a long time to come. they know that educating their kids only in French will leave them disadvantaged & marooned. The PQ gov't has language police who go about seeing to it that the ridiculous language laws are being obeyed. Most people see them as an absurdity & an embarrassment to Quebec. On all public signs, French must appear 1st & be more prominent than English. Businesses with more than 50 people must operate in French (a law everyone ignores: some businesses operate in Chinese or Greek!).

The PQ gov't & the French press tries to stir up resentment & cultivate divisions between the French & everyone else, but the general public sees through the ruse & finds them laughable. Further muddying their efforts to cultivate a national French identity is that many French speakers here come from Algeria, Vietnam, Morocco, Senegal, Congo & Belgium! They speak French BUT several other languages as well & have their own cultures: they aren't 'Quebecois'. Europeans, Asians & Africans typically are multilingual so they don't see what the fuss is all about.

The PQ didn't truly win: the Liberals lost. They 'won' their minority gov't by a hair's breadth & they know that if they go too far, the 2 other parties will unite, form one group & force them right out of office. They won by making many expansive & florid promises that theyhaven't a chance in hell of keeping. Just today, the French college students were out in the streets demanding the free college tuition (!) the PQ promised. Marois, like usual, will blame Ottawa (Canada's capital) for refusing to give QC the funds for this: further 'evidence' that Canada is out of touch with the needs of QCers.

Everyone knew they'd do this & other than naive 18-22 yr olds, nobody is fooled. The PQ needed the youth vote & was prepared to say anything in order to get it.

What does it have to do with the USA? A lot. The American separatists are using far right white America's irrational racial fears as fuel to serve their political agenda. They point to Obama as 'evidence' of some kind of conspiracy to hand America over to Al Qaeda (or the Jews, or the Mexicans or the Italians & the Chinese or the 3 dorks left in the Black Panthers) depending upon which nut-job group of uninformed imbeciles one is in. The wealthy men behind this movement don't give a hoot about so-called 'race' & they especially son't give a crap about hoards of what they consider to be 'white trash': they care about MONEY. Lots of it. They use the fears of poor, working class & Fundamentalist whites to gain support for their agenda. These people feel falsely empowered & vindicated when in fact their truly ignorant 'understanding' of politics is being exploited. These wealthy men may be the same colour as they are but that it all they have in common.

As is the case here in Qc, those who would sign on for separatism are an uninformed, paranoid, ignorant minority. Anyone with any sense & political/economic understanding would see this for the disaster (for anyone not a multi-millionaire) it truly is.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Spinning Compass
Read time
3 min read
Views
840
Comments
2
Last update

More entries in General

  • Messages
    I gave it my all during today's 1:1 PT session at the gym. It was tough, but he was happy that I...
  • A trip to the woods
    A trip into the local Fens and Nine Acre Woods. Ed
  • Today's first solo gym session
    Gym session went well. Given how sore my muscles were, I'm surprised that I could do 3 sets of...
  • First solo trip
    This muscle soreness is going to make today's first solo gym session a case of mind over matter...
  • Tonight I trance
    I give an offering of some of my water each time I visit the old oak tree. Respect your elders...

More entries from Spinning Compass

Share this entry

Top Bottom