• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Poltroon

  • Author Author Geordie
  • Create date Create date
  • Blog entry read time Blog entry read time 6 min read
It is said that autistic people are poltroons. They are wretched cowards who stand in the way of success. They stand in the way for the accomplishments of their organization's, their family's and for some cases, even their very own successes.

View attachment 2037

I do not know how the negative attitudes in autism came about. If autism had not been a negative part of life, perhaps there will be no incentive for parents to feel pain when they hear of their children's and grandchildren's diagnosis. If not, you cannot explain the formation of both Autism Speaks and a for-Aspies-by-Aspies anti-cure group, WrongPlanet.

We are living in the midst of at least three such epidemics- of autism, attention deficit, and childhood bipolar disorder. (Dr. Allen J. Frances)

There had been increasing numbers of cases for autism, ADHD diagnosis in recent times.

In the 1950s, there used to be 1 in 10,000 children who have autism in the United States, as Dr. Lawrence Wilson noted.

Now, the rate is 1 in 110 children, as reported by Autism Speaks.




As noted in Baird G, Simonoff E, Pickles A et al, five-sixths of the people with autism spectrum disorder have either PDD-NOS, or Asperger?s Syndrome. Asian countries till this day are virgin territory in this regard. But with the rise of the affluence of China and the "Asian Tigers" like Singapore, HK, Taiwan, S.Korea, it is only a matter of years before more advanced diagnosis methods reach there. The ill effects of over-diagnosis will threaten their countries' social fabric.

There had been increasing awareness of learning disabilities or disorders. Indeed, autistic people who are mentally retarded fell, in correspondence to the rise in low-functioning, non-Asperger?s Syndrome or PDD-NOS population, as Professor Richardo Dolmetsch of Stanford University noted. And to the credit of worldwide healthcare systems, more appropriate help has been given to improve the lives of these people.

However, it fails to explain the problem seen in the higher-functioning autism population. Since the introduction of Autism in DSM-III in 1980 and the addition of Asperger?s Syndrome in DSM-IV in 1994, there had been a spike in the diagnosis of those people. In addition, a similar trend can be seen in AD/HD. In the UK, from National Health Service reports, an estimated 0.5 per 1,000 children had ADHD in the 1970s, while 3 per 1,000 received ADHD medications in the late 1990s. The numbers continue to spike.

The trends in the diagnosis of special needs are staggeringly abnormal. What could be the reason behind the increase in number of people with autism spectrum disorder, ADHD or more?

Societal attitudes could be one of the factors. Students in a highly competitive social culture like in some parts of Asia with overzealous parents or studying in standardized test score-centric schools have to endure treatment after treatment, to improve their schoolwork performance, and not the other areas that they are good or interested in, like the arts, sports and other areas. In addition, many societies have evolved into more conformist and social-centric society. If the child does not meet the society's or the parent's expectations or being that nail that sticks out, the common thought would be is "there's something wrong with my child."

Educational trends in UK, US and Australia move towards a more centralized standardized testing system, where students are graded and assessed based on their academic potential, which require them to fit the requirements of their papers in order to move on to their next levels. Meanwhile the social culture of many Asian countries mistakenly emphasize too much on paper qualifications more than the true caliber of their individuals, unleashing a merciless arms race between individuals from grade school to high school to universities; an bad attitude that permeate their education systems, leaving a bad impact their people's well being. Diagnosed individuals even up the bottom of the food chain of the societal food chain

Similar trends can also be seen in global spread of information. It used to be the case that different firms have different niches around the world. A high degree of latitude is given to different cultural behavior and characteristics around the world, in the past.

Presently though, best practices in firms cause a degree of uniformity in all people, in order to reach an attainment of best outcomes throughout the world. In this society, any outstanding behavior that do not more effectively promote one?s best interests is seen as ?anti-social?, and hence, anyone exhibiting such anti-social behavior is seen as a ?weirdo?, and deserved to be alienated from the rest of society or in some cases, killed off indirectly. This includes socializing with other people in a different way from others, writing and reading in a different manner as compared to the others, as well as interpreting different ideas differently from others.

It is estimated by Dr. Frances that a child with autism spectrum disorder costs the taxpayer about $10 million for his entire life. The same could be said for other special needs. Imagine what happens if society does not fund the child for ?speech therapies? and ?play therapies? that put him further from greatness to create value for society. There will be less waste of resources for national development, and there will be a higher well-being and worth for those people with special needs. This will drastically reduce the numbers of people on the dole and at the same time, a boost to the ?special needs community? and its overall level of happiness.

Current diagnosis of autism, AD/HD and even dyslexia do not account for different people?s natural inclinations. Some people are more inclined to do visual arts, others are more motivated to involve in sporting activities. Not all wants to involve in academia, or professions that involve too much writing or reading. In this way, people with special needs, once diagnosed, are now placed further away from their true callings.

There is also a possibly that some normal people who exhibit social behavior similar to those who have special needs, might be mistakenly diagnosed for having special needs. These people end up no better than their special needs counterparts, as they are often framed in the same mindset to act and behave like special needs people. One such example is the otaku culture that is gripping Japan, Taiwan and S. Korea. The anime director, Hideaki Anno, calls such behaviour as a form of "forced autism". The anti-social behaviour of such individuals such as the famous Otaku Killer set off a moral panic against innocent Japanese animation lovers as suggested by increased targeting of otaku by law enforcement as possible suspects for sex-related crimes.

This further contributes the spike of special needs population, furthering burden society with their loafing of societal resources. Hence, the extension of diagnosis of special needs to people who do not really medically fit diagnostic criteria may possibly strain the able special needs people?s ability to relate better and contribute to society. In addition, the spike in the special needs population may lead to an undeserved awareness for the group, which will not lead to acceptance of these people as full members of their society.

Instead of being aware of one's troubles, it would be more helpful for the world to see one more person who is able to bring his gifts and wonders to the world. The world does not need more diagnosis to bring more headaches for itself. It has enough of such nuisances. It has so much issues that it has grown nonchalant to them. This is seen in the society's failure in maintaining social welfare, for the good of all people, particularly the disadvantage.

As an alternative for people who can contribute to our world, it is better to replace diagnoses they receive with more support for their gifts and talents. Giving them more leeway in order for them to pursue their interests in non-conformist interests that they can excel in will be better for them personally, as they experience increased levels of self-esteem. It will also be better for their communities, as they become their community?s source of pride. It will also contribute to the society?s overall happiness in having more talented people, adding colors and flavors for our world, to make it more interesting with different peaks of talents.

Only with better support for our current special needs population as a whole, will we be able to bring awareness of the special needs population with acceptance. Only so, can we live without fear or misfortune.

Comments

Well, think of it 2 ways... with "the need for a diagnosis". Because actually, it's quite often that people around you... bosses, co-workers, other students, parents and whoever is involved with you, that label you as odd and "hard to handle". In way, having a diagnosis kinda puts the emphasis on "F-off I'm different and now you know it!".

It's no wonder more people are "on the spectrum"... and even less strange people actually have PDD-NOS... yes, apparently there is something wrong, but we don't know what... "Not Otherwise Specified". If no one would judge you on being "different" I wouldn't need this. Also, due to a rise in population, employment is getting harder and harder all the time, apparently there is no room for you to actually do what you're good at, with our without a diagnosis.

If it's being said that people on the spectrum actually stand in the way of their own succes, the succes of an organisation, their parents... what if I, besides from eventually being on any spectrum, don't care if the organisation or company I work for, is succesful. There isn't a single company I worked for, I did care enough for to not hope it would burn down to the ground. My parents... meh, I have my own opinion about children, growing up and parents, so I probably diverge quite a bit in the general consesus.

As for "my own succes"... what is succes? And when is it succes? Is succes measured by how much money you make? Or is it measured by how much time you have to spend something you actually love to do? Both? People would probably blast me for the following expression but "succes actually depends on others". I can be a good artist, yet that does not mean that my work appeals to everyone. And what if my work appeals to a select group because it's "that special"? I'm willing to use the example of for instance a "singer" in some Death metal band... he's good at his craft, yet he's by no means a "generally" good musician. He's succesfull yet it depends on how many people like his craft, his (and his bands) music. I believe that there isn't a single craft where you can be good it, regardless of what people think about it, and thus it really depends on how much "customers" you have.

Another point of view, and I've adressed this before on this board; what if I can get a degree in whatever course. If no company hires me, maybe because there's no job openings at the time... how much is my degree worth? It's only worth something if someone, who can put good use to it, adheres value to it. Someone who tells me "I do housecleaning for a job"... good for you, I don't need someone to clean my house, so the fact that he has this job is of no relevance to me, nor is his "expertise" in the field. Yes, the bigger picture states that apparently there's people who do care for having someone to do their cleaning. But seriously, if I have to rethink each and every possibility to see if there is a market for this, I'm retiring without savings because I did nothing but speculate on future perspectives.

There is a thing I want to get out... it kinda sticks in my mind. Seeing I'm 29 now and on my way to a diagnosis myself, I keep thinking... in Holland there is no requirement to enlist in the national army. That was different years ago. When I was 15 or so they said it wasn't required. And that's 14 years ago. Now... if it that "law" still was around, I might have gotten a diagnosis earlier, because I'd probably fail my (probably tough) psychological screening during the enlistment courses. Otherwise, if I didn't fail, I did have job experience in a specific field without going to college and might have had an easier time to land a job due to more experience. In the end result there would probably be a few people that don't need one but actually "forced" it like Hideaki Anno says.

I do agree with the fact that they should support people with their needs and talents more... but it shouldn't neccesarily be instead of a diagnosis. It could go hand in hand... not everyone with a "label" can't do anything, it just happens some are really, really good at something... just put focus and praise on that, instead of forcing them to "level" with everyone else, which is actually what happens.
 
Why do we even need a diagnosis when all it does is to keep us away, from many opportunities in life, because of the perception is brings? But we do need such labels if we need to survive on governmental services or professional help, so it's a hard call to be officially diagnosed with conditions such as Asperger's Syndrome or PDD-NOS.

As for success, yes, it depends on others. And we know how much Autism takes away opportunities for success, because we are short on social support and intuition/skills other non-Aspies/Auties have for granted. Nevertheless, we'll do our best to work on our skill sets, because they are the objective stuff that we can improve on, and we can feel comfortable doing, when others are 'sparring'/competing against each other as part of 'office politics' and inter-person group dynamics.

We'll support each other. For the good we do, we'll definitely keep up the good work. But whatever we can improve on, we'll improve on them :D

Thanks for the comprehensive comment, King_Oni!
 

Blog entry information

Author
Geordie
Read time
6 min read
Views
1,131
Comments
2
Last update

More entries in General

More entries from Geordie

Share this entry

Top Bottom