• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Odd question from another autistic

By definition, co-morbids are secondary conditions; on top of one's autism.
There is no shame in that.
It is the severe co-morbids that are inexplicably on the rise, not autism generally.

From where you got all that info may i ask? it's interesting. Is a 'interest' to know about this to you.
 
What is the prevalence of such allergies in the general population? I have simply never heard of an allergy that causes brain damage, even though I have autoimmune issues - inherited from the other side of the family than autism - and have read a lot and in depth about autoimmune conditions.
 
Well, I guess I'm doing my part then. Emotional dysregulation AND immune dysregulation. Oh - and blood pressure dysregulation, and body temperature dysregulation...
Oh my goodness, yes. I have the all the same. I thought I was crazy until I learned how common these are in autists.
 
I am skeptical about autism being a hereditary condition because in most cases the genes that supposedly cause autism have not been identified. There is evidence, for example, that the women who consumed alcohol during pregnancy are more likely to have autistic children than the ones who didn't . There are other environmental factors as well, and there are plenty of proven environmental causes of autism.
 
It would take a severe allergy to cause an injury. The most I got from mine is a rash.

You're lucky. I nearly died from taking aspirin, ended up in the emergency room and was shot full of epinephrine to enable me to breathe. That's an acute allergy that can cause death.
 
There is evidence, for example, that the women who consumed alcohol during pregnancy are more likely to have autistic children than the ones who didn't . There are other environmental factors as well, and there are plenty of proven environmental causes of autism.
Could you please provide the sources of this information?
 
I am skeptical about autism being a hereditary condition because in most cases the genes that supposedly cause autism have not been identified. There is evidence, for example, that the women who consumed alcohol during pregnancy are more likely to have autistic children than the ones who didn't . There are other environmental factors as well, and there are plenty of proven environmental causes of autism.

I think you're confusing fetal alcohol syndrome with autism. They are not the same thing.
 
Since I figured out I am learning a lot about myself, sure getting a lot of info from my fellow autistics. Does it have something to do with my unusual blood type, or the fact both my parents had this blood type is it all related to immunity really got me thinking. six siblings four autistic us four have same blood type all six bright, ASD1 autistics tend to be bright is this correlated.
 
I am skeptical about autism being a hereditary condition because in most cases the genes that supposedly cause autism have not been identified. There is evidence, for example, that the women who consumed alcohol during pregnancy are more likely to have autistic children than the ones who didn't . There are other environmental factors as well, and there are plenty of proven environmental causes of autism.
The vast majority of human characteristics are caused by a large number of genes interacting, enhancing, canceling traits. Sometimes the expression of a gene or group of genes can be influenced by environmental factors.

The simple one gene one color of Mendel’s experiments with peas are the exception, not the rule. There is also evidence Mendel tinkered with his reported results.

The last I checked, which admittedly is some time ago, inheritance is observed by looking at family trees. (We cannot put humans in a lab and force them to breed.)

Check the research on blue people for an illustrative example.

From looking at family trees, it appears autism has a genetic component, likely a large one.
 
Watched a few videos on Mendel, he was very anal about his data would love to see his data do some statistical analysis, Read the article questioning his data years ago, now questioning this article. If he is an Aspie like me, I am anal about data, do not think he would fiddle with it. Agree with article he got lucky using peas. I was shocked my covid data, was so good until I after two years of collection checked at 5 sigma level almost had heart attack, cannot make this stuff up.
 
Last edited:
This is one of my sources of information
Autism and Alcoholism's Close Connection
Thank you. It’s good to see the source.

It looks like a very brief description of one human study with significant limitations that was followed by this:

1745002534343.webp


Perhaps it would be informative to also consider the prevalence of alcoholism in women with undiagnosed autism and subsequent use during pregnancy.
 
This is one of my sources of information
Autism and Alcoholism's Close Connection
One really has to investigate the reliability and sources in articles posted on the web.

If I were investigating this article, I would go back to the original Danishand Norwegian research. People who summarize others’ research often get it wrong.

Plus, in spite of admitting there is no correlation between maternal alcohol consumption and autism in the exposed child, they still make the claim that autism could be caused by maternal alcohol consumption. There are at least two conclusive statements for which they provide no documentation.

One needs to learn to read critically.
 
I am not al lawyer, but I have studied the law on my own after an incident involving myself. I also like reading new data about lawsuits. This is a link to the website that lists a large number of lawsuits involving autism in various countries:
Autism Court Cases | Global Database Of Autism Court Cases
Obviously, none of these lawsuits has references to hereditary conditions.

Oh, for heaven's sake. If you've studied law on your own, then surely you know that allegations in lawsuits are not evidence. They're just allegations. That's all.
 
I am skeptical about autism being a hereditary condition because in most cases the genes that supposedly cause autism have not been identified.
A simplified description of Polymorphism:

It's actually every pregnant woman's greatest fear - will my baby be normal? The truth is that no baby is "normal" as in a correct copy of the genetic material supplied. Mutations occur in almost every case. If this wasn't true then all of us would be carbon copies of our siblings, looking identical and having identical brains and identical characteristics. Most mutations are small, different coloured eyes or different hair, more freckles. A relatively common mutation is Albinism.

To simplify how this might work in an evolutionary sense consider a large cat living in the wild, it has several kittens from the one mating. Not all of those kittens will be identical. What if one of those kittens had slightly longer legs than it's siblings? If they lived on flat open plains where running speed was an advantage in hunting prey then the cat with longer legs would have an advantage, it would be more likely to survive and pass it's mutated genes on to it's offspring.

If however they lived in a more geologically complicated area such as large boulders, gullies and steep hills then having longer legs would not be an advantage. And if their most common prey was of a type that was likely to fight back then longer legs would be a distinct disadvantage - less power in longer limbs due to extra leverage imposed. In this type of situation the cat with longer legs would be less likely to survive and less likely to have any offspring that would inherit it's genes.

So in short - yes, autism is hereditary, but that doesn't account for all cases. It's also possible for two people with no autism in either of their family's histories to have autistic children.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom