A friend of mine found this article titled:
I am a disillusioned BCBA: Autistics are right about ABA
BCBA stands for: board certified behavior analyst.
The link to the article is below:
I am a disillusioned BCBA: Autistics are right about ABA » NeuroClastic
I was not surprised after reading the article, but I was shocked by some of the things, sickened and angered by other things and overall greatly disturbed. I do not have direct experience with ABA, but I have indirect experience with it because one of my autistic nieces underwent intensive Lovaas ABA therapy for a good number of years in her childhood. Her therapy included an ABA person coming to her home regularly, etc. I was disturbed by some of the "therapies" taught to her parents such as the insistence on eye contact to the point of interrupting her while she was trying to communicate with others to insist on eye contact.
My biggest "take away" from reading the above article is a reinforcement of my conviction and what I believe to be fact: Neurotypical neurology isn't the "right", "correct"neurotype. Its' the most prevalent, but that does not mean it's the ideal neurotype warranting the correction of or modification of neurodiverse neurtypes in an attempt to convert ND neurotypes to NT. That's deeply disturbing to me and has an almost eugenic mindset in relation to a mental health practice.
Also, knowing the contributions that ND people have made toward the advancement of humanity, the premise and goal of ABA is in my opinion, an egregious affront to neurodiversity and to autism specifically.
I am a disillusioned BCBA: Autistics are right about ABA
BCBA stands for: board certified behavior analyst.
The link to the article is below:
I am a disillusioned BCBA: Autistics are right about ABA » NeuroClastic
I was not surprised after reading the article, but I was shocked by some of the things, sickened and angered by other things and overall greatly disturbed. I do not have direct experience with ABA, but I have indirect experience with it because one of my autistic nieces underwent intensive Lovaas ABA therapy for a good number of years in her childhood. Her therapy included an ABA person coming to her home regularly, etc. I was disturbed by some of the "therapies" taught to her parents such as the insistence on eye contact to the point of interrupting her while she was trying to communicate with others to insist on eye contact.
My biggest "take away" from reading the above article is a reinforcement of my conviction and what I believe to be fact: Neurotypical neurology isn't the "right", "correct"neurotype. Its' the most prevalent, but that does not mean it's the ideal neurotype warranting the correction of or modification of neurodiverse neurtypes in an attempt to convert ND neurotypes to NT. That's deeply disturbing to me and has an almost eugenic mindset in relation to a mental health practice.
Also, knowing the contributions that ND people have made toward the advancement of humanity, the premise and goal of ABA is in my opinion, an egregious affront to neurodiversity and to autism specifically.
Last edited: