Recently I heard an interesting interview with Donovan Bailey, a Canadian 100M sprinter who won a gold medal at the Olympics a few years ago, also breaking a world record in the process...
But the point of this is actually a comment he made during that interview... Despite breaking a world record and getting that gold medal, he said that he can look at that tape and find things he could have done better (improve on a world record? )
It made me think of my photography, I tend to be very critical about it, I will notice things I messed up, an area of really bright highlights on an otherwise interesting moment, some distracting background elements I don't like much... But am I the only one seeing what I consider to be a flaw?
Or is that a good artistic trait to have? I do think that sometimes something artistic doesn't always have to be perfect, that there can be a storytelling element that trumps any technical flaws
But the point of this is actually a comment he made during that interview... Despite breaking a world record and getting that gold medal, he said that he can look at that tape and find things he could have done better (improve on a world record? )
It made me think of my photography, I tend to be very critical about it, I will notice things I messed up, an area of really bright highlights on an otherwise interesting moment, some distracting background elements I don't like much... But am I the only one seeing what I consider to be a flaw?
Or is that a good artistic trait to have? I do think that sometimes something artistic doesn't always have to be perfect, that there can be a storytelling element that trumps any technical flaws
Last edited: