I like to ponder theology among other things.
Lately I've been thinking about the Christian belief in God, Heaven, Salvation, life on Earth, etc. Specifically related to human suffering on Earth and how that figures into Salvation.
For this thread, I'm thinking of two categories of suffering:
1) Suffering which is a direct or indirect consequence of one's own choices based on one's own free will. Direct consequence suffering example could be, choosing to ignore traffic signals and getting hit by a car as a result and sustaining painful lasting repercussions. Indirect consequence suffering example could be, choosing to smoke cigarettes for decades and developing lung cancer as a result.
2) Suffering which is NOT related to a person's actions or choices. Innocent victims who suffer. Examples could be: Children who suffer from painful diseases, human hunger, starvation, war, random acts of violence, random accidents, etc.
For the sake of my ponderance, the first kind of suffering isn't relevant to the discussion.
However, the second kind of suffering: It seems the Christian view is: The Earth is an imperfect place and is rife with suffering. God offers a better alternative in the afterlife (e.g. Heaven) in which there is NO suffering. All you need to do is [ whatever the specific Christian denomination espouses to be the "roadmap" to Heaven ].
^ This perplexes me. I get that the counterbalance, the alternative, the remedy, the "reward" for earthly suffering is taught to be Heaven. However, why does their even need to be the innocent suffering on Earth in order for there to be salvation?
Would the following scenario result in less or no believers going to Heaven?
What if God created Earth as a miniature version of Heaven? No innocent suffering (free will and suffering based on one's own choices still apply as does death). The Christian message being: "Isn't it like "heaven" living on Earth? Do you want to live forever in similar wonderful ways (ie free of suffering)? All you need to do is [ whatever the specific Christian denomination espouses to be the "roadmap" to Heaven ].
Innocent suffering doesn't need to be a requirement at all. An omnipotent God can eliminate innocent suffering. It doesn't have to exist.
It's difficult to square the idea that God is benevolent when unnecessary innocent suffering chosen by God to be in the equation seems malevolent.
Lately I've been thinking about the Christian belief in God, Heaven, Salvation, life on Earth, etc. Specifically related to human suffering on Earth and how that figures into Salvation.
For this thread, I'm thinking of two categories of suffering:
1) Suffering which is a direct or indirect consequence of one's own choices based on one's own free will. Direct consequence suffering example could be, choosing to ignore traffic signals and getting hit by a car as a result and sustaining painful lasting repercussions. Indirect consequence suffering example could be, choosing to smoke cigarettes for decades and developing lung cancer as a result.
2) Suffering which is NOT related to a person's actions or choices. Innocent victims who suffer. Examples could be: Children who suffer from painful diseases, human hunger, starvation, war, random acts of violence, random accidents, etc.
For the sake of my ponderance, the first kind of suffering isn't relevant to the discussion.
However, the second kind of suffering: It seems the Christian view is: The Earth is an imperfect place and is rife with suffering. God offers a better alternative in the afterlife (e.g. Heaven) in which there is NO suffering. All you need to do is [ whatever the specific Christian denomination espouses to be the "roadmap" to Heaven ].
^ This perplexes me. I get that the counterbalance, the alternative, the remedy, the "reward" for earthly suffering is taught to be Heaven. However, why does their even need to be the innocent suffering on Earth in order for there to be salvation?
Would the following scenario result in less or no believers going to Heaven?
What if God created Earth as a miniature version of Heaven? No innocent suffering (free will and suffering based on one's own choices still apply as does death). The Christian message being: "Isn't it like "heaven" living on Earth? Do you want to live forever in similar wonderful ways (ie free of suffering)? All you need to do is [ whatever the specific Christian denomination espouses to be the "roadmap" to Heaven ].
Innocent suffering doesn't need to be a requirement at all. An omnipotent God can eliminate innocent suffering. It doesn't have to exist.
It's difficult to square the idea that God is benevolent when unnecessary innocent suffering chosen by God to be in the equation seems malevolent.