Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
As @Progster avers, romance movies and TV series are indeed escapist fantasy, but the best of them have observations of life buried in them. I would point out that the "Lord of the Rings" is at its core a Romance in all its forms. You may hate it for other reasons, but it is rife with elements of high romance if you have eyes to see.
The Asians are more open about the fantasy at the heart of all romance in their films and literature. Real or imagined, many of us yearn for the kind of connection that is at the heart of all romance. I am addicted to rom-coms, as silly and unrealistic as they are because it makes me feel good to dwell in the fantasy for a while.
Not particularly compelling arguments for romances, but it is my honest opinion.
Now, this I get. How can the emphasis on scifi be on the 'science' and not on the 'fiction'? The term 'science fiction' is a noun, but as science is descriptive of fiction--meaning, it modifies the type of fiction we're talking about--the word science here although a noun by definition is being used as an adjective. Therefore, the phrase science fiction is in actuality an adjectival phrase. Romance is similarly a subset of fiction, therefore science fiction and romance are parallel genres under the umbrella of fiction in general, although subplots and devices used in the stories themselves may borrow to one degree or another from other genres. That a story is plugged into one genre or another has much to do not only with character arc and plot but how the story is played out--who's introduced when, what plot points are followed, where are the beats and what is the quality of the pacing? Take Jupiter Rising, for instance. Romantic comedy? No--science fiction because of the pacing and absurd events, even though there is a romantic subplot to the story. Take Leap Year. Beyond the speculative idea that the poor heroine's misfortunes are so cumulative, there really is no science here to consider. (Romantic comedy's not my strong suit. I'm all out of titles.)Unfunny joke deconstruction: The emphasis in the term scifi is on the science not the fiction as scifi is a subset of fiction of which romance is already a part.
These are not facts. I have seen real situations in my life, in many films and television shows. Relationships in them are not realistic but many of the moments are.Romantic movies should be considered science fiction because
nothing that happens in them is real. Change my mind.