hyperman89
Well-Known Member
hello everyone. I used to know a guy a few years ago.
He was what I realise now, a sociapath, an oh so convincing evil person.
He drove like an absolute maniac, 90 mph in 30 zones, 150 on the motorway, crashing into bollards doing handbrake turns, overtaking a car already stopped at red traffic lights and a young family was halfway across so missed them by inches.
He also committed arson, attacked a guy in the street [who allegedly lunged at him] but didn't, shouted and pushed his girlfriend until she wanted to kill herself, blew up fireworks in an enclosed public space, deliberately followed two young girls home in a car whilst handbrake turning and then tailgating them repeatedly.
He got arrested and thought it was funny, and in court got sentenced [though not a prison one] to do community work and a suspended sentence for two years, meaning if he did anything wrong in that time span he'd get sent down.
Well, I found out recently that he has now got a job looking after children.
He also seems to have passed the checks needed to do this.
He is EXTREMELY convincing when he wants to be, he can fool anyone who doesn't know him, so I'm thinking maybe he's fooled whoever ticks the check box to make sure the people are safe to look after kids.
It's either that or our criminal record system is ridiculously short term based. The offences were only a few years ago so I can't understand how a serious offence and multiple arrests would warrant a 'yes' for looking after children. What are your thoughts??:furious:
He was what I realise now, a sociapath, an oh so convincing evil person.
He drove like an absolute maniac, 90 mph in 30 zones, 150 on the motorway, crashing into bollards doing handbrake turns, overtaking a car already stopped at red traffic lights and a young family was halfway across so missed them by inches.
He also committed arson, attacked a guy in the street [who allegedly lunged at him] but didn't, shouted and pushed his girlfriend until she wanted to kill herself, blew up fireworks in an enclosed public space, deliberately followed two young girls home in a car whilst handbrake turning and then tailgating them repeatedly.
He got arrested and thought it was funny, and in court got sentenced [though not a prison one] to do community work and a suspended sentence for two years, meaning if he did anything wrong in that time span he'd get sent down.
Well, I found out recently that he has now got a job looking after children.
He also seems to have passed the checks needed to do this.
He is EXTREMELY convincing when he wants to be, he can fool anyone who doesn't know him, so I'm thinking maybe he's fooled whoever ticks the check box to make sure the people are safe to look after kids.
It's either that or our criminal record system is ridiculously short term based. The offences were only a few years ago so I can't understand how a serious offence and multiple arrests would warrant a 'yes' for looking after children. What are your thoughts??:furious: