• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Diagnosed last week by Tania Marshall

Dryope

Active Member
Hi Everyone -- I was diagnosed last week, in a Skype meeting with Tania Marshall.

I posted a little bit about it on Wrong Planet and plan to write up a bit there this weekend on what it was like.

Is anyone interested? I can also post here.

I'm not sure what people think about this kind of diagnosis. It's a little different from some of the other routes. I did a search on this site on her name and didn't find much -- did anyone else get diagnosed by her?
 
I've heard of Tania Marshall and seen her webpage. She specialises in ASD in females, and at first glance, it seems to have a lot of extremely useful information about female traits, including some free downloads (though unfortunately some of those moving banners which are distracting and make it hard to read). Tania Marshall | Female Aspergers | Autism Spectrum

Diagnosing via Skype is indeed unusual. The main disadvantage I can think of in diagnosing via Skype is that she won't be able to see your body language and use of eye contact, and I think that this is a reason why other clinicians don't conduct Skype interviews. Otherwise, if she follows the procedures I don't see why it wouldn't be a good and valid diagnosis. I don't know how other professionals would view this, though.

The other cynical voice in me is telling me that she is an independent private clinician who makes her living from these diagnoses, and this flashy site, despite the useful resources, is designed to sell - books, therapy and diagnoses. Not that there's anything wrong with selling one's services, but it does occur to me that perhaps it may be tempting to her to overdiagnose. But perhaps I'm being unfairly cynical here?
 
Out of curiosity, does she send a letter or other form of diagnostic confirmation by mail? If so, I'd be interested to know exactly what it says.

Did you seek diagnosis for your strictly personal reasons, or are you hoping that your diagnosis will assist you in getting services?
 
I don't see anything wrong with it, especially if you used a webcam. I can see a diagnosis being accurate via webcam or FaceTime. You would react to the face the same in person or on the screen and, your body language would be somewhat visible.
 
As the posters on Wrong Planet have noted; eye contact doesn't really happen on Skype. If you are looking at the other person's eyes then from their perspective you will appear to be looking below their gaze because the camera is above the screen. Likewise, (unless they have the strange habit of looking directly into the camera) the other person well not appear to be looking at you, which could very well make it easier to look them in the eye anyway. Beyond that, the clinician would only be able to establish that you were looking at the screen, but not precisely where you are looking.
 
Hi Guys -- I wrote this up on WrongPlanet today and am pasting the same post here:

Hi Everyone -- I'm posting on my recent experience with an evaluation on Skye with Tania Marshall.

I'm a woman in my late 30s with a healthy dislike for therapists. They tend to say I'm "emotionally unavailable" and that I am expressing myself "well"...even when I'm complaining that I have difficulty articulating what I mean. They tend to gaslight me (The Gas-lighting of Women and Girls on the Autism Spectrum | seventhvoice). It's not pleasant.

I've read EVERYTHING I can find on people like me: twice-exceptional, gifted, adult women with ASD. That last one is tricky, but I have taught myself everything I can from online sources, books, and PubMed. I knew I likely had ASD but I was dreading paying several thousand dollars to have a team of therapists attempt to misunderstand me.

I wasn't sure about Tania Marshall's online service. A therapist I was seeing (who could not diagnose ASD but who suspected it) advised against seeking this kind of evaluation. He caused me a lot of harm, so I decided to ignore him on this.

What sold me on Tanya was not the low cost (a tenth of what I would pay in the US system): it was that she has experience with adult women on the spectrum. My mother was evaluated at Duke Hospital as part of a study (she is not on the spectrum) and received the usual battery of tests...many of which were designed for children. Simply put, I had no faith in the current US diagnostic system or its tools as they pertain to adult women. You are welcome to disagree with me there, but that's my stance.

Tania evaluated me based on:

-- two four-hour discussions with me on Skype.
-- a five-page account I wrote of my life and why I think I am on the spectrum
-- emails from my mother and husband on my strengths and challenges
-- my RAADS-R results (self-administered)
-- my artwork, such as it is (to evaluate "talents")

She said she looks for the DSM-V criteria and also for "themes" she has commonly seen among women with ASD. She did not list them all for me, but did say that feeling rejected socially, being shy and withdrawn, thinking too much, and having a strong sense of justice -- all from an early age and throughout her lifetime -- are the common themes among ASD women and which she saw in me. Also, sensory issues. This is where the artwork comes in, too: people on the spectrum tend to have "talents," usually in art, science, or math. I focused on learning languages, so my artwork was pretty crappy.

Unlike other therapists, I found she tended to accept what I said at face value without having a hidden agenda. I am used to feeling "managed" by therapists -- manipulated really -- and I didn't get this sense at all. I was able to say and react naturally without her misunderstanding me. This is exactly why I wanted to be evaluated by someone familiar with women on the spectrum: I did not want to have to explain my body language or reactions. I didn't have to, and that was nice. I was able to relax and let down my guard.

One negative is that she wasn't able to evaluate eye contact or my stimming. About a half hour into the conversations, my muscles in my legs and arms began contracting and I began moving my hands. I knew she couldn't see this, so I told her about it. Again, some people may want the evaluator to be able to see body language more clearly. I was fine with this method. I told her that I had studied eye contact, so we didn't think it was important to evaluate.

One bias I've heard (and had myself) is that these kinds of evaluations can be slanted toward accepting all comers as being on the spectrum: diagnosis mills or some such. My mind was put at ease when Tania told me that she sees clients who are not on the spectrum, but who have similar challenges because they are gifted or twice exceptional, or who have ADHD. She said that not everyone who comes to her for evaluation has ASD, although many are on the neurodiverse spectrum.

She did evaluate me as having ASD in the end. Please let me know if you have any questions or otherwise want to talk about the process.

I told her I would be writing about this on WrongPlanet, and she asked me to forward this information along:

A link on her website that directs people to professionals in a variety of countries who work with females and/or are knowledgeable about females on the Spectrum:
Female ASC Professionals - Tania Marshall | Female Aspergers | Autism Spectrum

And a page on the female gender bias, discussing why women with ASD are often missed or misdiagnosed:
Webinar: The female autism conundrum —
 
Hi!! How long did it take to get an appointment with her to get the assessment. I'm still waiting to hear from her!! I'm losing it!

Thanks.


Hi Everyone -- I was diagnosed last week, in a Skype meeting with Tania Marshall.

I posted a little bit about it on Wrong Planet and plan to write up a bit there this weekend on what it was like.

Is anyone interested? I can also post here.

I'm not sure what people think about this kind of diagnosis. It's a little different from some of the other routes. I did a search on this site on her name and didn't find much -- did anyone else get diagnosed by her?
 
Hi!! How long did it take to get an appointment with her to get the assessment. I'm still waiting to hear from her!! I'm losing it!

This thread is from 2015, and the OP hasn't been seen on here since the end of July 2015.

Perhaps there's a long waiting list or Tania Marshall's not diagnosing via Skype any longer?
 
Last edited:
Please seek someone else to do your diagnosis. I did not have a good experience trying to get a diagnosis with Tania Marshall. She should not be practicing and has caused much emotional damage to myself and my daughter. Happy to elaborate via email if you wish to know more..
 
Hi there,
What happened??

Please seek someone else to do your diagnosis. I did not have a good experience trying to get a diagnosis with Tania Marshall. She should not be practicing and has caused much emotional damage to myself and my daughter. Happy to elaborate via email if you wish to know more..
 
I’m having problems with a diagnosis from Tania Marshall not delivering the service promised. Could suzanne672004 please contact me.
 
Hi Guys -- I wrote this up on WrongPlanet today and am pasting the same post here:

Hi Everyone -- I'm posting on my recent experience with an evaluation on Skye with Tania Marshall.

I'm a woman in my late 30s with a healthy dislike for therapists. They tend to say I'm "emotionally unavailable" and that I am expressing myself "well"...even when I'm complaining that I have difficulty articulating what I mean. They tend to gaslight me (The Gas-lighting of Women and Girls on the Autism Spectrum | seventhvoice). It's not pleasant.

I've read EVERYTHING I can find on people like me: twice-exceptional, gifted, adult women with ASD. That last one is tricky, but I have taught myself everything I can from online sources, books, and PubMed. I knew I likely had ASD but I was dreading paying several thousand dollars to have a team of therapists attempt to misunderstand me.

I wasn't sure about Tania Marshall's online service. A therapist I was seeing (who could not diagnose ASD but who suspected it) advised against seeking this kind of evaluation. He caused me a lot of harm, so I decided to ignore him on this.

What sold me on Tanya was not the low cost (a tenth of what I would pay in the US system): it was that she has experience with adult women on the spectrum. My mother was evaluated at Duke Hospital as part of a study (she is not on the spectrum) and received the usual battery of tests...many of which were designed for children. Simply put, I had no faith in the current US diagnostic system or its tools as they pertain to adult women. You are welcome to disagree with me there, but that's my stance.

Tania evaluated me based on:

-- two four-hour discussions with me on Skype.
-- a five-page account I wrote of my life and why I think I am on the spectrum
-- emails from my mother and husband on my strengths and challenges
-- my RAADS-R results (self-administered)
-- my artwork, such as it is (to evaluate "talents")

She said she looks for the DSM-V criteria and also for "themes" she has commonly seen among women with ASD. She did not list them all for me, but did say that feeling rejected socially, being shy and withdrawn, thinking too much, and having a strong sense of justice -- all from an early age and throughout her lifetime -- are the common themes among ASD women and which she saw in me. Also, sensory issues. This is where the artwork comes in, too: people on the spectrum tend to have "talents," usually in art, science, or math. I focused on learning languages, so my artwork was pretty crappy.

Unlike other therapists, I found she tended to accept what I said at face value without having a hidden agenda. I am used to feeling "managed" by therapists -- manipulated really -- and I didn't get this sense at all. I was able to say and react naturally without her misunderstanding me. This is exactly why I wanted to be evaluated by someone familiar with women on the spectrum: I did not want to have to explain my body language or reactions. I didn't have to, and that was nice. I was able to relax and let down my guard.

One negative is that she wasn't able to evaluate eye contact or my stimming. About a half hour into the conversations, my muscles in my legs and arms began contracting and I began moving my hands. I knew she couldn't see this, so I told her about it. Again, some people may want the evaluator to be able to see body language more clearly. I was fine with this method. I told her that I had studied eye contact, so we didn't think it was important to evaluate.

One bias I've heard (and had myself) is that these kinds of evaluations can be slanted toward accepting all comers as being on the spectrum: diagnosis mills or some such. My mind was put at ease when Tania told me that she sees clients who are not on the spectrum, but who have similar challenges because they are gifted or twice exceptional, or who have ADHD. She said that not everyone who comes to her for evaluation has ASD, although many are on the neurodiverse spectrum.

She did evaluate me as having ASD in the end. Please let me know if you have any questions or otherwise want to talk about the process.

I told her I would be writing about this on WrongPlanet, and she asked me to forward this information along:

A link on her website that directs people to professionals in a variety of countries who work with females and/or are knowledgeable about females on the Spectrum:
Female ASC Professionals - Tania Marshall | Female Aspergers | Autism Spectrum

And a page on the female gender bias, discussing why women with ASD are often missed or misdiagnosed:
Webinar: The female autism conundrum —
For anyone clicking to link to her website I was directed to a you have won scammer website when I clicked I'm in n.e.england
 

New Threads

Top Bottom