alien girl
Well-Known Member
I just found out on the net that sometimes, when a kid was abused, the police take the kid into prison instead of a foster home under the excuse that it's in the child 'best interest.' a child can be held in lockup for 48 hours without a trial.
it seems to me that they can just put the kid in a faraway foster home and not tell anyone where he is, or a safe house. There's also police protection.
and I dont believe in the whole country they cant find a foster or group home/orphanage. sounds like they're too lazy to look too far, and simply throwing an innocent child who'd been traumatized in prison is easier than police protection, more convenient.
and knowing the justic system, somehow i have a nagging suspicion that the child will not be allowed to walk freely in the building and yard while the other inmates are locked up, and will be forced to wear prison uniforms. that they won't bend the rules just because it's an innocent kid. that he'd be subject to the same punishing and opressive restrictions criminals are, although they have nothing to do with safety and security.
a woman i know told me about a safe house for abused women. they should have one for abused children instead of jail. it can be secured with cameras and guards.
i know this doesnt happen often, and usually kids end up in foster homes. but on the rare occasions that it does, what do you think?
it seems to me that they can just put the kid in a faraway foster home and not tell anyone where he is, or a safe house. There's also police protection.
and I dont believe in the whole country they cant find a foster or group home/orphanage. sounds like they're too lazy to look too far, and simply throwing an innocent child who'd been traumatized in prison is easier than police protection, more convenient.
and knowing the justic system, somehow i have a nagging suspicion that the child will not be allowed to walk freely in the building and yard while the other inmates are locked up, and will be forced to wear prison uniforms. that they won't bend the rules just because it's an innocent kid. that he'd be subject to the same punishing and opressive restrictions criminals are, although they have nothing to do with safety and security.
a woman i know told me about a safe house for abused women. they should have one for abused children instead of jail. it can be secured with cameras and guards.
i know this doesnt happen often, and usually kids end up in foster homes. but on the rare occasions that it does, what do you think?