• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Government Study Suggests Autism Overdiagnosed

ancusmitis

Well-Known Member
Government Study Suggests Autism Overdiagnosed
Michelle Diament said:
October 27, 2015 Text Size A A

With as many as 1 in 10 children with autism ultimately losing their diagnosis, a new government study suggests some kids placed on the spectrum shouldn’t be.

Looking at data from a federal survey of parents of over 1,500 kids diagnosed with autism, researchers found that the developmental disorder may be overdiagnosed in more than 9 percent of cases.

The study, published online this month in the journal Autism, was produced by researchers at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the University of Washington, the National Institutes of Health and the federal Health Resources and Services Administration.

Researchers looked at parent responses from the 2011 Survey of Pathways to Diagnosis and Service on 1,420 kids with a current autism diagnosis and 187 previously diagnosed children, all of whom were between the ages of 6 and 17.

About 13 percent of kids initially identified on the spectrum subsequently lost the diagnosis, the study found. Most often, parents reported that children shed their label due to new information.

Several factors may be contributing to overdiagnosis, researchers said. It could be the result of imprecise screening and evaluation processes or difficulty distinguishing kids with language issues from those with developmental delays.

In some cases, however, parents admitted that clinicians gave their child an autism diagnosis simply because that label would make services more readily available.

Despite the relatively high rate of children who lost an autism diagnosis, however, researchers said that just a fraction of these kids had in fact “recovered.” Only 3 percent of children who shed their diagnosis did so as a result of “treatment or maturity,” the study found, and it remains uncertain if all of those children were correctly labeled to start.

It’s also unclear whether instances of children losing their diagnosis are becoming more common, according to Stephen Blumberg of the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics and his colleagues. What’s more, researchers indicated that overdiagnosis alone remains insufficient to explain dramatic increases in autism prevalence in recent years.

“This study confirms that ASD diagnoses can and sometimes do change as children mature and overcome delays, and as new information is assimilated by their health care providers,” Blumberg and his colleagues wrote in their findings. “These changes over time can complicate the use of surveys and retrospective surveillance methods to estimate the current prevalence of ASD, the characteristics of children who currently have ASD and the adequacy of services for this population.”

http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2015/10/27/government-study-autism/20907/
 
The question then is... if these kids are not on the autism spectrum, why are they diagnosed? Clearly they're not functioning the way society needs them to function.

As much as I believe in a proper diagnosis, moving kids around from label A to label B (and label C eventually; while putting them on meds) is a big hog on financial resources for all parties involved as well.
 
As the article mentioned, some people get an autism diagnosis purely to receive services. I've seen this myself, actually, doing respite care for kids with brain damage and fetal alcohol (only spent a few months doing this). The only traits they shared with autism were the ones that Hans Asperger himself noted, and all of the ones he noted that distinguished Autism from BD were absent from these kids. And I saw a teenager with down syndrome who had a lot more autistic traits than the other kids, but he did not get diagnosed with autism because he already had a label. Similarly, I have met people in school who successfully bullshitted themselves into a diagnosis of ADHD so they could get drugs.

This is why I really dislike the method of counting the number of people diagnosed with a thing. Sociologically it can be interesting, but it useless for prevalence. I think there was a study done by Lorna Wing back in the eighties where they came up with their own criteria for asperger syndrome and evaluated a representative sample of some population or other in order to estimate true prevalence. Of course, that was before DSM-IV, and there weren't any diagnoses to count.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom