The Penguin
Chilly Willy The Penguin
I want to hear your thoughts which company do you think is more evil. Microsoft or Apple? One example can be like, you don't like this company business practice because....
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
I guess each person can see something in different ways. I know there endless stuff on the web a person hate Apple cause of .... or a person hates Microsoft cause of....Neither corporation is evil, we live in a capitalist world where the law of supply and demand is 'god'. Both corporations feed the need that is generated at grass root level through marketing. Marketing is driven by the peoples choice as a feed back loop, as such there is no evil.
I don't have any issues companies protecting proprietary technologies. I can also understand why companies do what they do. But still waiting for someone to write something relevant on why I create this post for.While consumers may never appreciate corporations aggressively protecting the proprietary technologies they create, they are nevertheless the intellectual property of the manufacturers. Not the users.
And as corporations their charter and obligations are always going to be first and foremost to their shareholders, officers and directors, employees and customers. In that order.
I don't have any issues companies protecting proprietary technologies. I can also understand why companies do what they do. But still waiting for someone to write something relevant on why I create this post for.
I not disagreeing what both of you wrote, but what both of you wrote is not what I am looking for.I think Harrison54 covered that quite well. "Evil" isn't part of the equation.
I not disagreeing what both of you wrote, but what both of you wrote is not what I am looking for.
It is not that simple for having a language based learning disability. Anyhow, someone will get it within time.Considering this is an Aspie forum, perhaps it would be better for you to put your intentions in plain sight. Otherwise they might easily be misinterpreted.
It is not that simple for having a language based learning disability. Anyhow, someone will get it within time.
I get that. I face this issue no matter what site I use. However, I still write things as I know there is some people will understand what I'm trying to say. This is an issue I need to deal with for my whole life. I know no one willing to help me so this is the best I can do.If you are expecting people to be mindful of your condition, perhaps it would be in your best interest to also be mindful of theirs rather than be cryptic in what you are obviously soliciting for.
Sometimes you won't get the kind of answer you want. That being said, this is far more complex than a question of good versus evil.I not disagreeing what both of you wrote, but what both of you wrote is not what I am looking for.
However, I still write things as I know there is some people will understand what I'm trying to say.
I felt I did. Anyways, we not getting anywhere on this. Maybe we both should just stop this discussion here.That's just it. Write about what you are trying to say. Don't make people have to guess at it.
If I don't get the response I want for this post it is not the end of the world for me. Though I did look at the link you sent me, I might having trouble trying to get your message. I do know your trying to use that example to see if I can write better for future posts. My writing issues is very complex. Many people had trouble to get me to understand. At the same time, cause of my writing issues, it can be hard for me to get people to understand what I want to say. To me I thought this would be a fun discussion. But it didn't end up turning out this way. I guess what I might consider interesting may not be for other people. But I see also people pointing out the issue arise on how I wrote this post. I guess writing for me will be the hit and miss approach because of my writing difficulties.You're not responsible for ending threads. Don't close a discussion because you're not getting replies you want to hear.
My earlier post is a good starting point for further talk about which is morally superior, at least on one specific issue.
It's true that not everyone finds the same things interesting or fun, but what makes you think that other participants aren't interested? If we weren't interested, we wouldn't be posting in this thread.To me I thought this would be a fun discussion. But it didn't end up turning out this way. I guess what I might consider interesting may not be for other people.
For example, let's look at the use of conflict minerals in computers and other products. Both Microsoft and Apple are among the better performers:
Conflict Minerals Company Rankings | RAISE Hope for Congo
Yes, that's true. I freely admit that I'm not as informed as I could be on the subject, but I do know that Nintendo has consistently refused to make any sort of progress, which is especially horrible given that it's a giant in the video game industry.Very interesting. It appears to reflect somewhat of a pattern in terms of considerations of resources procured by some corporate entities as opposed to others.
I don't know. Anyways, I just hope one day get the response I want and if not, it is not the end of the world.It's true that not everyone finds the same things interesting or fun, but what makes you think that other participants aren't interested? If we weren't interested, we wouldn't be posting in this thread.