benjimanbreeg
Well-Known Member
http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=152223037
lol
lol
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
I think it's possible.
Jesus was never married which is extremely rare for a Jewish male in that age and society.
There's also gospels which were excluded form the bible which claim Jesus spent a night with a 12 year-old boy.
Jesus was extremely liberal and actually went out of his way to not conform to Jewish standards and broke laws for the lulz.
Jesus made a deal about acceptance.
I don't think he was homosexual though. More like bisexual. 'Cause no one has a prostitute as a best 'friend', esp. when you're not married. Unless of course, you're gay.
Like, probably 3 months ago in the change.org news letter it talked about a site full of quotations from the New Testament saying why Christians should actually be advocates of gay marriage. I could dig it up, but someone will have to PM me because I never remember to on my own, and even with PMs I don't get around to it all the time.
EMZ=]
Read the Gospel of Thomas for a hoax-free, purely naked, wide open, horizon-swallowing Jesus.
Just Jesus as the Wise Sage, not veiled in fairy tales and all the greatest literary hoax; just pure-land Wisdom (for both theists and atheists, and also for pantheists, panantheists, multi-theists, and any crazy, but intelligent hyperfolds). If anyone fails to love/see him after reading this truly ancient, pre-Nicean text, he/she'd better pluck his/her heart/eyes and not exist ^_^.
What's the Romanized 'Jesus' (Ze(z)us?) anyway? ^_^ The real name is Yehoshua (have respect for indigenous names please).
After that, the Gospel of Mary and the Apocryphon of Yohanan (John) are also sort of self-quelling.
Serious Oriental scholars don't ever say that the Apocrypha are 'fake' (what a dry field of query for them without these texts!), rather they predate the official New Testament of Pauline Christianity in both depth and historicity; only the Church says it's all not worth it.