How would I know! I only remember negative things. I then said: ah, so you must have spent the money on positive things then?
As NT, I would say your reply does sound odd. I can understand your logic there, but the reply is unexpected. Unexpected as in, I would’ve never
thought of that (although it kind of makes sense). It’s like you are taking a completely different approach on things. So to answer your question directly, yes I think it is aspie thinking.
Taken out of context, this could be a line in a comedy. It’s like half pointing out the-obvious-that-is-overlooked and half “I did not see that coming.”
Back to what your husband were trying to say. To me, it sounds like you were perceiving what he said with a sharp divide between the positive and negative, so when he said he couldn’t remember, you immediately thought: he can’t remember
negative things—did not remember what he spent the money on—that must be
positive. But he could be there thinking, there are
so many reasons for not remembering something. In short, what he remembered was because it was negative, what he didn’t remember—who knows why he didn’t remember.
This is how I’m interpreting what he said. First off, when he said he
only remembers the negative, it’s an exaggeration. No one can
only remember the positive or the negative. But it’s possible that the statement is true when it only pertains to the incident of stealing money. Two, when he said he didn’t know because he only remembered the bad things, he might’ve meant that the whole situation with his father was bad, instead of just the stealing incident alone. Or, the whole incident of stealing was negative (actions, emotions, repercussions, etc.), so whatever was positive did not pertain to actual things (like buying items with the money). It’s also possible that he thought everything involved with having the money and spending it was positive, instead of just the action of buying items or the items themselves.