• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Learning social rules by Temple Grandin

Mia

Well-Known Member
V.I.P Member
Learning Social Rules
By Temple Grandin

Autism Asperger’s Digest | January/February 2005

Children and adults on the autism spectrum are concrete, literal thinkers. Ideas that can’t be understood through logic or that involve emotions and social relationships are difficult for us to grasp, and even more difficult to incorporate into our daily lives. When I was in high school, figuring out the ‘social rules’ was a major challenge. It was not easy to notice similarities in peoples’ social actions and responses because they were often inconsistent from person to person and situation to situation. Over time, I observed that some rules could be broken with minor consequences and other rules, when broken, had serious consequences. It perplexed me that other kids seemed to know which rules they could bend and break and which rules must never be broken. They had a flexibility of thinking that I did not have.

I knew I had to learn these rules if I wanted to function in social situations. If I had to learn them, they somehow had to be meaningful to me, to make sense to me within my own way of thinking and viewing the world. I started observing like a scientist and discovered I could group the rules into an organizational format to which I could relate: into major and minor categories. By the time I was a senior in high school I had a system for categorizing some of the social rules of life. I still use the same system today.

I developed four rule categories: 1) Really Bad Things; 2) Courtesy Rules; 3) Illegal But Not Bad; and 4) Sins of the System.

Really Bad Things. I reasoned that in order to maintain a civilized society, there must be prohibitions against doing really bad things such as murder, arson, rape, stealing, looting and injuring other people. If really bad things are not controlled, a civilized society where we have jobs, food in the stores and electricity cannot exist. The prohibition against really bad things is universal in all civilized societies. Children need to be taught that cheating – in all forms, not just on tests – is bad. Learning to “play fair” will help a child grow into an adult who will not commit really bad things.

Courtesy Rules. All civilized societies have courtesy rules, such as saying “please” and “thank you.” These rules are important because they help prevent anger that can escalate into really bad things. Different societies have different courtesy rules, but they all serve the same function. In most countries, some common courtesy rules are: standing and waiting your turn in a line, good table manners, being neat and clean, giving up your seat on a bus to an elderly person, or raising your hand and waiting for the teacher to point to you before speaking in class.


Read the balance of the article here:

http://autismdigest.com/learning-social-rules
Copyright © Autism Asperger’s Digest. 2005. All Rights Reserved.


BIO


Temple Grandin is an internationally respected specialist in designing livestock handling systems. She is the most noted high-functioning person with autism in the world today.



(Mods please move this if you are so inclined should be in Asperger's & Autism Directory. Unable to post there.)(Also there's the 10% requirement for copyright law, don't know if that applies on the site?)
 
Last edited:
Lately I've found myself focusing less on learning the "normal" social system, and more on trying to figure out what makes sense to me. I don't intend that in a selfish way--I don't demand that others conform to my system. But I've found that faking it all the time...always trying to pretend to be normal...leaves me feeling lonely on a level that isn't easy to describe. I can fake it well enough that other people feel fairly comfortable with me and "accept" me and think they're connected to me...but it's not the real me, so then I never actually feel loved for me.

Like...if eye contact and physical contact are so uncomfortable for me, then what kind of contact is comfortable? If small talk doesn't work for me, what can I talk about with someone where we both leave the conversation feeling heard? If the usual expressions of love don't appeal to me (hugs, gifts, compliments, etc), then what does?

Beyond all of that, though, there do have to be commonly accepted standards. Like she said, the "really bad things" must be controlled in order for society for function well enough.

Thought-provoking article...thanks for posting.
 
Lately I've found myself focusing less on learning the "normal" social system, and more on trying to figure out what makes sense to me. I don't intend that in a selfish way--I don't demand that others conform to my system. But I've found that faking it all the time...always trying to pretend to be normal...leaves me feeling lonely on a level that isn't easy to describe. I can fake it well enough that other people feel fairly comfortable with me and "accept" me and think they're connected to me...but it's not the real me, so then I never actually feel loved for me.

Like...if eye contact and physical contact are so uncomfortable for me, then what kind of contact is comfortable? If small talk doesn't work for me, what can I talk about with someone where we both leave the conversation feeling heard? If the usual expressions of love don't appeal to me (hugs, gifts, compliments, etc), then what does?

Beyond all of that, though, there do have to be commonly accepted standards. Like she said, the "really bad things" must be controlled in order for society for function well enough.

Thought-provoking article...thanks for posting.
Right. I am in a similar position.

I just do not think that it's worth it anymore for me to fake through everything. I am a complete person, and although I have some deficiencies I would rather figure out how to work with them and compensate for them rather than ignoring them or smoothing over them.
 
Living and believing that I was an NT all of my life and then discovering all the difficulties related to that, why I was never close to anyone, why I disliked socializing and found ways to disappear. Why family members called me 'weirdo' because I questioned most things, and spent my time with books and drawing. Made it hard to know and understand who I am, having been pushed into the world and programmed to fit in.

Yes...spending 4 decades not realizing how different my experience of the world has been. Like...I thought everyone was pretending to be normal. I thought everyone studied people to learn how to dress and how to act and what words/phrases/topics to say. I thought everyone was faking emotions so as to give the right impression. It's still slowly sinking in how different I am...and also, how hard I've worked to have seemed to be as functional as I am. Like...I didn't realize other people weren't working this hard at it, too.

Letting myself just...be myself...is much harder than I thought it would be, though. I've buried my self for so long.

They are things that I've come to understand are meaningful to me but not overt. Look closely at the unchampioned things in your life, perhaps you will begin to comprehend what they mean.

I think this is very insightful. Yes...there are things my DH does that sort of help to structure my existence. It's not big stuff. But it's consistent. And it's one thing or another where he's actually attuned to something I like, rather than something I've expressed "gratitude" for just because it's polite to be thankful when someone gives you something (even if it's something you didn't want). The times he's hit on those little, consistent things that accurately reflect what I value inside...it's like, in that, maybe he knows me (the real me) a little...maybe he's tuning in to who I am on a more authentic level. Subtle and consistent seem to be key characteristics of the expressions of caring that I value most.

I just do not think that it's worth it anymore for me to fake through everything. I am a complete person, and although I have some deficiencies I would rather figure out how to work with them and compensate for them rather than ignoring them or smoothing over them.

Well stated. This is why it concerns me when the focus is so much on teaching autistic kids how to "fake normal" better. I get that we all have to make adaptations in order to get along. But there has to be space for authenticity, or it won't work long-term. Eventually, a system built on pretense will collapse under the weight of itself.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom