• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Microscopy Geeks: Cytoplasmic Streaming?

OkRad

μῆνιν ἄειδε θεὰ Πηληϊάδεω Ἀχιλῆος οὐλομένην
V.I.P Member
I have heard 2000x is best for cytoplasmic streaming. Yes? This would be for plants. I guess blood drops would be fun, too! But mostly to see cytoplasmic streaming in plants.
 
Used to do a lot of microscopy. One project was to measure cell cycle length and S-phase duration in rat mammary gland epithelial cells. I did this through dual labeling with tritium or C-14 Thymidine. S-phase is calculated from the time Between tritiated Thymidine and C-14 Thymidine injections and the proportion of cells with single and dual labels. The tissues were fixed, sliced by microtome, stained, and then coated with a photo emulsion and allowed to develop. Then a Collodion layer was applied, to stop the alpha from the tritium and another photo emulsion applied then developed. One could then see single or dual labels by focusing through the two emulsion layers since C-14 beta would expose both layers, and Tritium alpha only the lower layer, then tally their proportions.
 
A bit more involved than What I did in college gram staining, looking under the microscope, but then engineering was more my interest.
 
I don't know much about this subject. But I do love looking in microscopes. It was wonderful teaching biology last year, because my daughter and I got to spend a lot of time magnifying different specimens under the scope.

It was fun being able to see stuff like the glucose in leaf veins and the different things that owl pellets were composed of.

And don't even get me started on my fascination with binoculars or telescopes!
 
Any thing that says you can magnify greater than 900 times with a visible light microscope is fake. The laws of physics has not changed since I was in college.
 
Any thing that says you can magnify greater than 900 times with a visible light microscope is fake. The laws of physics has not changed since I was in college.
Exactly. The limit to oil immersion optics with visible light is 1,000 x, and that is also assuming you are coupling the condenser to the specimen with high refractive index oil.
 
Last edited:

New Threads

Top Bottom