• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

My Son Has the Kind of Autism No One Talks About

AGXStarseed

Well-Known Member
(Not written by me. Some people may find this article upsetting)



Like most parents of children with autism, I have been reading about the family in California who is being sued by several families in their neighborhood. The lawsuit contends that their child is a public nuisance because of his behaviors that his parents failed to fix.

One of the plaintiffs in this case stated "This is not about autism. This is about public safety."

But he is wrong. This is absolutely about autism. It's just not about the autism people hear about.

The media shows us all of the feel-good stories, like the child with autism who gets to be the manager of the high school basketball team, or the boy with autism who goes to the prom with the beautiful girl, or the girl with autism who is voted onto the homecoming court. We light it up blue every April and pat ourselves on the back for being so aware.

But we aren't aware.

Because for every boy with autism who manages his high school basketball team, there are 20 boys with autism who smear feces. And for every girl with autism who gets to be on the homecoming court, there are 30 girls with autism who pull out their hair and bite their arms until they bleed. And for every boy with autism who gets to go the prom, there are 50 boys with autism who hit and kick and bite and hurt other people.

This is the autism that no one talks about. This is the autism that no one wants to see.

We aren't aware

One of the plaintiffs said "We're not upset about him being autistic. We are concerned and upset about his violence (toward) our children."

There is no way to be upset by this child's behaviors and not be upset about autism.

Autism and behaviors go hand-in-hand. Why? The behaviors are communication. Individuals with autism often can't communicate in a way that typically functioning people can understand. So they do things to get their needs met. And often the things they do are scary and violent.

We aren't aware.

My son, who is the same age as the child in this story, was extremely aggressive when he was younger. He did all of the things that the child involved in this lawsuit did. My son ran after other children on the playground just to push them down. He hit. He kicked. He bit. He pulled hair. And I never knew what was coming. For the longest time, I would flinch when he ran up to me...I didn't know whether he was going to hug me or hit me. Can you imagine, as a mom, what that's like? To flinch when your child runs to you?

We aren't aware.

Because I didn't know what my son was going to do to other children, we stopped going to the park. We stopped going to the Mommy and Me class at the library. We started going to the grocery store at 6:00 a.m. when most people weren't around. He didn't go to daycare but had a sitter at home so he wouldn't be around other kids in a daycare setting. I essentially isolated him in order to keep other people safe. Can you imagine what it's like to be a mom and not be able to take your child to the park? Or have your child attend birthday parties? Or have play dates?

We aren't aware.

Because of my need to isolate my son, I also isolated myself too. I watched from my window as other moms in the neighborhood sat in their camp chairs and chatted while their children played. I couldn't join them because my son couldn't be around the other kids. Once a mom asked if my son could come to their house and play with her son. Can you imagine what it was like to feel so excited and then feel so ashamed when, after explaining my son's issues to her so she would be aware, that invitation was rescinded?

We aren't aware. Not at all.

But we can be. We can open our eyes and understand that autism isn't all about the high functioning child who is "quirky" but OK to be around. Autism isn't all about the six-year-old who can play Piano Man better than Billy Joel. Autism can be hard. Autism can be sad. Autism can be messy. Autism can be violent. Autism can be isolating.

Once we become really aware, lawsuits like this won't happen. Why? Because instead of putting blue lights on our front porches, we will go outside with our kids and we will help them play together...typically functioning kids and kids with autism. We will get to know our neighbors and we will embrace the children with behaviors and embrace their parents along with them.

We will learn what things trigger our child's classmate who has autism so that we can help the children interact while avoiding things that will cause aggression. We will be a true village, including those who can model appropriate behaviors and those who are trying so hard to learn them. We will work on teaching our children not to hit and how to avoid being hit.

The parents involved in this lawsuit, on both sides, need to do more. More education, more understanding, more inclusion and more involvement.

Now tell me, is autism the real public nuisance?

We can become aware...if we really want to.



SOURCE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bonnie-zampino/is-autism-the-real-public_b_8191918.html
 
The comments after that story, are the kind of internet comments that hurt.

But here is a quotation from one of the more intelligent ones.
written by "djoyg". Not written by me

"I don't know any of the people involved and don't live in the area. I don't have any autistic children myself. I find the article extremely lacking in important details. Am I to understand that the autistic child is let out from the from door of his home to wander unsupervised? Likewise, are the other neighborhood children wandering about without parental supervision? Because I'm having a difficult time understanding how all of this has ever escalated to the point it has. If the defendants allowed their child to wander the neighborhood unsupervised I would think the parents out supervising their own children would be enough to intervene and prevent problems. I suspect there are no supervising parents. All parents involved would like to be negligent in their parental responsibilities and the plaintiffs are angry that the defendants child does not allow them the ability to stay indoors while they allow they children to run wild about the neighborhood.
Yes. I actually do live next door to a young man similar to the one in this story. At about 6 or 7 (he's now 19) I had to explain to his parents why it wasn't working out to have him over. They were very upset, they claimed he was nearly well when at my house, I think they had some misguided fantasy that I would share custody. Yes, they let him out unsupervised. It was as if they hoped someone would come along and abscond with him. But my children never had another problem with him. Because they were never out my front door unsupervised. On the occasion that our neighbors son climbed the fence into our garden my sons came indoors and told me, they played indoors until he left. You may think, "Oh, but this boy is far worse." I doubt it. By puberty my neighbor's son spent most of his time at "special" sleep-away school. Home at holidays, out wandering the neighborhood unsupervised again.

It really seems everyone involved in this case is angry and really bitter that they have to supervise their own children and not simply roam the neighborhood at will.
 
Last edited:
One big, sticky mess no matter which way you come at it. On the one hand, you have those "helicopter parents" that try to micro-manage every last thing their kids do so that everything is theoretically perfect and who fall apart over the least little thing not to their liking. Then on the other, those very negligent parents that really do let their kids do whatever, such as one of my bratty acquaintances who enjoyed hurting people and did NOT have an official psychological issue. Between the two extremes, all us normal folk are caught in the middle trying to figure out which kids are in serious need of discipline and which ones just have issues that need a little extra care and patience. And that's not counting the entitled folk all around who won't accept responsibility for anything they do!

A little common courtesy and decency really would fix so many problems like the one presented in the article.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom