Hi! I am a parent of autistic boy who is 6 and has significant difficulties with speech. We went through public kindergarten and while he goes there without any issues, they fail him academically. Most importantly I never see other kids from his class really interacting with him. He is smart boy loving minecraft, gymnastics, swimming, steam trains and attempting to learn skateboarding.
We decided that private school (not therapeutic but focused on academics and social interaction) will be a better place for his academic needs and finding friends.
If you attended private school for autistic kids, was it a right choice for you? Please share your experience and outcomes. I can’t ask my son yet.
I did not attend specifically a private school, but was homeschooled in a private school. It has its advantages and disadvantages. At the moment I'm not too far out from graduating college, but we'll see if anything comes after that.
I would say that, if you do a private school, ensure that the house has books and that your son makes sure he can go on out & look for interaction with other people. The besetting sin of private schooling is the sense of snobbery that could come from it--with home schooling, there's the concern of elitism coupled with the very real danger of being completely isolated.
So what I suggest is, if you think private schooling is a good idea, go for it, but ensure the possibility of a support structure for your kid in the meantime while he's studying (as in, the next 12 years of grade school and high school.) Which I'm sure you'll do; you're looking for the answer anyway.
I think home schooling and private schooling have been a mixed bag, same as if I was to have gone to a public school. At the end of the day I think private/home was a great blessing and help but at the same time there are certain areas where I'm making up for lost time. For example, I'm pretty odd about social stuff and am working on that--and some elements of the very conservative curriculum I was in were far from factual. Take for example the history book we used--
Christ the King, Lord of History by Anne W. Carroll. It is an answer to a question no one was asking, a sort of preemptive counteraction for accusations no one made, delivered with the style of a lapel-grabbing used car salesman who moonlights as a YA fiction novelist. Even worse, in the author's frothy enthusiasm for glorifying all things done by religions she likes (Judaism and Catholicism) in countries she approves of (ones with, usually, white people mostly) she forgets to teach history, and that which she does teach is always skewed.
So I went to a thrift shop and for sixty cents purchased a whopping grand copy of
France: A Modern History, by Albert Guerard, published back in 1969 by the University of Michigan up in Ann Arbor. It's both well-written and comprehensive, at least as comprehensive as a single volume can be.
A good education knows when it's licked. It knows where its shortcomings are, and then it tries to fill them in with the good stuff.
Stick with private schooling; there you may find a better shot at learning the material instead of just passing a test--and if your son starts figuring out
why the material matters, then, congratulations: he is an educated man. But for the love of sanity, ensure he has something to do.
(As a purely personal aside:
Minecraft? A boy of
six? Get the boy out of doors and let him learn a game that doesn't involve sitting still tampering with a computer; he can geek out when he's a grown man and stuck in front of one of those things like the rest of us. Let him enjoy childhood while he still has it. Sorry, but as the forum's resident technophobe I am mostly obliged to say stuff like that.)