DogwoodTree
Still here...
Here's the link to the article:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/art...ookPost&utm_medium=FBPost&utm_campaign=FBPost
I was especially intrigued by a paragraph near the very end of the article:
"Prodigies share a common foundation—an extreme working memory, focused attention to detail, and a startling ability to lock in on an activity with single-minded focus. But beyond these bedrock traits, they have unique cognitive profiles that vary by their area of expertise, finds Ohio State researcher Joanne Ruthsatz. On the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, music prodigies have the most extreme working memories, while math and science prodigies excel at spatial visualization, the ability to picture an object's movement through space and its physical transformation. Art prodigies, though, have relatively poor spatial visualization—a tendency researchers tie to rich object visualization, the ability to picture an object's color, shape, and size in vibrant detail."
https://www.psychologytoday.com/art...ookPost&utm_medium=FBPost&utm_campaign=FBPost
I was especially intrigued by a paragraph near the very end of the article:
"Prodigies share a common foundation—an extreme working memory, focused attention to detail, and a startling ability to lock in on an activity with single-minded focus. But beyond these bedrock traits, they have unique cognitive profiles that vary by their area of expertise, finds Ohio State researcher Joanne Ruthsatz. On the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, music prodigies have the most extreme working memories, while math and science prodigies excel at spatial visualization, the ability to picture an object's movement through space and its physical transformation. Art prodigies, though, have relatively poor spatial visualization—a tendency researchers tie to rich object visualization, the ability to picture an object's color, shape, and size in vibrant detail."