• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Self education and turning it into a potential career

Clintpauljohnson

Clintpauljohnson

Active Member
Some aspects of neuroscience and its implementation, either voluntarily or forced, in one way or another, may be against our human rights.

Some of the following information/statements and words, will guide someone to advise me towards a career choice:

mass hypnosis
trigger words
propaganda
game theory
paranoia
God,science, 1st, 2nd,3rd parties and government, is watching us.
canadian security intelligence service
politics
mass product placement
control, authority and history
media propaganda and mass disinformation
neuroscience
astrophysics
canadian law
gang stalking
targeted individuals
psychotronic weapons
google spys
facebook spys
smart tv spys
cell phone spys
daarpa
neurobiology of narratives
remote neuro monitoring
csis: canadian special intelligence society
electronic control grid
aspergers
nsa
neuralplasticity
superior intelligence and wisdom
artificial intelligence
Jesus is Lord
Father, Son and Holy Spirit is God
Free Speech
brain washing
forced chemical injections
biology
chemistry
advanced science
Man consists of spirit, soul and body
teach the way people learn
mass drugging of humans was masterminded in nazi germany using synthetic chemicals
some if not all, psychiatric drugs dehumanize, torture, disable and kill
will not remain silent
government trust?
one nation under surveillance
cyper intelligence vs wisdom
while you sleep mass media creates your reality, they tell you your morals and how to act/react, what to buy etc, they are your moral compass
people no longer need to go to church or read the bible, they get all their morality from media/government etc
people volunteer to be wire-taped etc
ABPN
people at the highest level of government do not want canada, to be canada
 
Sorry, but I don't think any of that will guide people towards giving you a good career choice. I have struggled a lot with career choice. I think it comes down to very concrete aspects of what you can manage to do well without burning out - sometimes that doesn't have much to do with our interests. Though even that can burn you out - so ideally, you can be interested/care on some level. But the ability to carry on with it is most important. I wasn't even able to figure that much out without trial and error. For example, I always thought a cubicle desk job would be best for me - until I realized in reality that involved lots of noise and interruptions/interactions with other co-workers, and I have horrible trouble sitting still for so long, it makes me antsy/anxious.

I think something else I needed to realize was - well, imho, what I was best at was understanding and exploring and analyzing my special interest subjects. However, yeah, that's what I did best to serve my own interests. But when working, we are working for someone else - even when self-employed, we are working to serve the needs or desires of others, or for the company, for whoever is giving us the money. That's where it became much more about in what environment in in what capacity could I perform best *for other people*. How could I perform best while meeting the employer's or customer's standards? That was very different from how I thought I could function/perform best when serving my own interests, curiosities, etc.
 
Last edited:
Clintpauljohnson said:
Some aspects of neuroscience and its implementation, either voluntarily or forced, in one way or another, may be against our human rights.

Some of the following information/statements and words, will guide someone to advise me towards a career choice:

mass hypnosis
trigger words
propaganda
game theory
paranoia
God,science, 1st, 2nd,3rd parties and government, is watching us.
canadian security intelligence service
politics
mass product placement
control, authority and history
media propaganda and mass disinformation
neuroscience
astrophysics
canadian law
gang stalking
targeted individuals
psychotronic weapons
google spys
facebook spys
smart tv spys
cell phone spys
daarpa
neurobiology of narratives
remote neuro monitoring
csis: canadian special intelligence society
electronic control grid
aspergers
nsa
neuralplasticity
superior intelligence and wisdom
artificial intelligence
Jesus is Lord
Father, Son and Holy Spirit is God
Free Speech
brain washing
forced chemical injections
biology
chemistry
advanced science
Man consists of spirit, soul and body
teach the way people learn
mass drugging of humans was masterminded in nazi germany using synthetic chemicals
some if not all, psychiatric drugs dehumanize, torture, disable and kill
will not remain silent
government trust?
one nation under surveillance
cyper intelligence vs wisdom
while you sleep mass media creates your reality, they tell you your morals and how to act/react, what to buy etc, they are your moral compass
people no longer need to go to church or read the bible, they get all their morality from media/government etc
people volunteer to be wire-taped etc
ABPN
people at the highest level of government do not want canada, to be canada
Click to expand...

That's a long list of thoughts.
Some seem to be related.

Try fitting them into groups that are related.
Maybe five groups.
For a start.
 
tree said:
That's a long list of thoughts.
Some seem to be related.

Try fitting them into groups that are related.
Maybe five groups.
For a start.
Click to expand...
Yes very informative. Will work on that. This list is off the top of my head.

This is for sure:

Human rights, neuroscience.
 
Ambi said:
Sorry, but I don't think any of that will guide people towards giving you a good career choice. I have struggled a lot with career choice. I think it comes down to very concrete aspects of what you can manage to do well without burning out - sometimes that doesn't have much to do with our interests. Though even that can burn you out - so ideally, you can be interested/care on some level. But the ability to carry on with it is most important. I wasn't even able to figure that much out without trial and error. For example, I always thought a cubicle desk job would be best for me - until I realized in reality that involved lots of noise and interruptions/interactions with other co-workers, and I have horrible trouble sitting still for so long, it makes me antsy/anxious.

I think something else I needed to realize was - well, imho, what I was best at was understanding and exploring and analyzing my special interest subjects. However, yeah, that's what I did best to serve my own interests. But when working, we are working for someone else - even when self-employed, we are working to serve the needs or desires of others, or for the company, for whoever is giving us the money. That's where it became much more about in what environment in in what capacity could I perform best *for other people*. How could I perform best while meeting the employer's or customer's standards? That was very different from how I thought I could function/perform best when serving my own interests, curiosities, etc.
Click to expand...

Good advice. Chances are I will need to work with/for someone else, in one way, shape or form.
 
Clintpauljohnson said:
Yes very informative. Will work on that. This list is off the top of my head.

This is for sure:

Human rights, neuroscience.
Click to expand...


Yes, I can see you were brainstorming.
Generating many thoughts.

Now the task is to bring them in order.
Don't feel obligated to go with 5 groups.
Three groups may be all that is necessary.

Three groups, with maybe a subheading in one.
 
Clintpauljohnson said:
Good advice. Chances are I will need to work with/for someone else, in one way, shape or form.
Click to expand...
There are people here who have made their special interest their career, so I don't want to discourage you too much. But the services/work also need to be in demand, there needs to be a niche, or one you can create, for what you have to offer in terms of good, solid work/product. I would say balance exploring your interests with what is feasible/available in the work world - and most of all, keep your abilities, needs, and weaknesses/challenges in mind, to try to prevent burnout.
 
So are you expressing a political/neurological sentiment, or seeking advice on a potential career? :confused:

Or both? :confused:
 
Do you see yourself doing lab research with animals, clinical research with humans, as a doctor, an engineer, an analyst at a think tank, or working at a non-profit organization? Though, you said you want to work for government, so I guess non-profit is out, as well as think tank. But with ethics/human rights, I don't think there are many practical jobs out there for that - you'd need to be involved in work that you felt improved or served those interests, imho.
 
I once attempted to seek such work as an analyst of sorts. Went through a complex series of interviews. However the job initially discussed morphed into something else, which was not IMO suitable to me emotionally or neurologically.

In such a line of work things could work out very well for you, or potentially be a nightmare.
 
Animals?

If the human subject being worked on, and after explaining the risks, allowed me to, then I would be open to experimenting on them.
 
Clintpauljohnson said:
Animals?

If the human subject being worked on, and after explaining the risks, allowed me to, then I would be open to experimenting on them.
Click to expand...

Those are moral considerations that I think you alone must decide upon.

Otherwise expect very spirited opinions for or against such things. Especially regarding animals.
 
Judge said:
Those are moral considerations that I think you alone must decide upon.

Otherwise expect very spirited opinions for or against such things. Especially regarding animals.
Click to expand...

Animals need respect too, but imo, human life is more important. Some would go as far as working on human animals with out consent. Or, labeling someone incompetent to decide, by so called specialists which will make it for them under certain laws convicting a person of a crime they are yet to commit.
 
Last edited:
If I'm understanding you correctly, then you seem to be interested in combining neuroscience and advocacy. I don't think you can self-educate yourself into that type of job, especially within a federal, provincial or municipal government. Most likely, you would need to establish some major credentials with at least a master's or law degree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom