Respect driven sounds more like the high powered type of narcissism, some are more low powered and come over as pathetic, this was their best strategy to gain attention in family of origin I guess. I m not expert on this, but my understanding of Narcissism is that it's a personality type developed in infancy and reflects an early stage of development where the child's needs were not met.
Narcissism in that way of thinking is hard to change, because the person has a world view whereby they have an idea that the world is all about them and their needs, natural in a baby but which normally we modify if our needs are adequately met at that stage. Then, where many with developmental issues would go to therapy or learn through later experience, this particular misapprehension leads to the person feeling it's not me it's everyone else, and continuing to try to meet their needs through getting positive feedback and attention, often called narcissistic supply.
I think my mum is in the low power version of this situation, they manipulate through distress and claim helplessness. She was a difficult parent due to this and has never really formed a 2 way relationship with me or my sibling, whilst expressing a wish that we were there for her more lifelong. One can't do enough for her, and help or connecting is critiqued and found wanting.
The high power type are more confident and their demand for respect can reach levels of aggression and dominance that are extremely abusive, at the extreme end I have seen this in people who abuse their children and partners, while keeping up a front of success and often of supposedly being a nice guy to the outside world that can be extremely hard to get around for the abused children or partner.
These people almost never seek help and if they do it's seemingly very hard for them to use help, because the existential childhood fear of not existing due to parental lack of ability or availability to attend to their early needs feels huge and continues to drive the narcissistic behaviour, as it does in the lower powered version. So they manipulate or spurn helpers, who they feel they cannot trust to offer them anything, and who offer insufficient narc supply.
I have had relationships with several low power narcissistic people, pulled in by the neediness which tugs at my own childhood wound, and left them eventually due to getting nothing back. I think my insight into that has changed my behaviour however, though I still seem more on the carer side of the relationship dynamic, typified in a Preoccupied adult attachment style.
After a lot of therapy, study, and life experience I am more able to notice this nowadays and move to a more secure win/win way of handling difficulties in relationships. But sometimes reacting initially from that place of childhood distress, to pacify or express helplessness.
Autism also feeds into this in various ways, but I would guess that some people with autism may also be narcissistic, and/or have an attachment style that is known as Dismissive, all of which can be worked on but their dismissal of others views or ability to help makes it unlikely they will change, just as narcissistic NTs rarely change.
Narcissistic autists are not only autistic, but are a product of their childhood experiences, some of which can be helped with if the helper both understands autism and in these situations, can engage with the dismissive or narcissistic person. It's hard to do on both sides, for NTs or NDs.
So I would say we generally may be prone to get relationships with people who are insecure and/or have personality disorders, partly because the dual barriers caused by autism and our own low security levels may leave us unlikely to attract secure people who generally have more choice. Specifically, we may be prone to make relationships through plunging in with people we don't know well, or who we feel are vulnerable, or to be dominated and chosen by someone in the high power narcissistic category. I agree, we can learn and move on from this.
Here is how I see it according to the Functional Cognitive Types (FCT)
I use a way of describing the types:
FCT (primarily diagnosed as)
Culture Types:
EC = extra-cultural (sometimes diagnosed as
ASD)
C = Cultural (Considered
NT here)
Drive Types:
U = Understanding Driven (sometimes diagnosed as
ADD)
R= Respect Driven (very rarely diagnosed as
NPD)
T = Trust Driven (very rarely diagnosed as
STPD)
A = Acceptance Driven (In CA considered very NT here, Most ASD people are ECA)
FCT (Eusocial Type)
ECR* would be considered autistic narcissist (King, Queen, Leader)
CR* would be considered a typical narcissist (King, Queen, Leader)
CA* Neurotypical (Worker)
CU* Typical ADDer (Drone)
ECU* Primal Type almost pre cultural human
ECT* Extra-Cultural Guardian (Soldier)
ECA* Most aspie and asd people
... and on and on... there is also a secondary type of U and T in what I call the modern types A and R (ECRT* is sometimes diagnosed as a sociopath.... they feel respect when you trust them even when they lie... my dad was this type: CRTC)
not trying to be political here but DJT is CRTS
Finally there is a Somatic-Cerebral type.
S = Somatic = drawn to novel experiences that generate adrenaline
C = Cerebral = averse to novel experiences that generate adrenaline
Everything is on a continuum so I add a - or a + to show a rough idea of where a type lands on the continuum.
- =
cusp (often between types)
+ =
extreme
unsigned = middle of continuum. most common expression
The types are written like this:
1 2 3 4
Culture Type | Drive Type | Secondary Drive Type | Somatic-Cerebral Type
Examples:
1234
CAUS (Cultural acceptance with a secondary of understanding somatic)
This type (especially women) is more liberal than the baseline beliefs of their community.
124
ECUS
Extra-Cultural Understanding Driven Somatic.
ASD + ADHD
124
CUS
Cultural Understanding Somatic
ADHD person
ECTS
Extra-Cultural Trust Driven Somatic
(Primal Guardian)
My wife is ECUC+ (primal extreme cerebral which makes her asexual and way overly cautious)
I am EC+U+S- (what I call extreme primal cusp somatic, I have sensed 2 "of me (EC+U+*") here but I seem to be limited to seeing young women in my extreme type... (this is actually predicted in the pre cultural human mating and mentoring theories. also... U people can see R people of the same (birth) gender but not of the opposite (birth) gender... without training). If any of this makes sense to you and you feel you are EC+U+* or ECU Let me know
Anyway... disorders make little sense because they are so focused on the
what and
how. I focus on the
why. In biology
why is the first question we need to answer
. Different species have different survival strategies. Humans have one
similar to ants, bees and termites, so we have types.