• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Trait tied to autism may explain emergence of realistic art

AGXStarseed

Well-Known Member
(Not written by me)

Researchers argue early humans with autistic traits 30,000 years ago may be responsible for a variety of innovations.


Trait-tied-to-autism-may-explain-emergence-of-realistic-art.jpg

The Chauvet Cave in Southern France is home to 30,000-year-old drawings of lions. Around the same time, detailed animal paintings began to proliferate in ice age caves. Photo by Wikimedia Commons


May 14 (UPI) -- Some 30,000 years ago, in the midst of the Ice Age, cartoonish caricatures of animals gave way to more realistic art. New research suggests the shift in aesthetic could be explained by "detail focus," a trait linked to autism.

Seemingly all at once, detailed depictions of bears, bison, horses and lions began to appear in significant numbers in Ice Age caves. Scientists have struggled to account for the sudden change.

Researchers have previously suggested psychotropic substances inspired the explosion of detail-oriented drawings, but a new study discounts such an explanation.

Instead, archaeologists at the University of York argue a trait linked with autism, called detail focus, jumpstarted the trend.

"Detail focus is what determines whether you can draw realistically; you need it in order to be a talented realistic artist," York archaeologist and lead researcher Penny Spikins said in a news release. "This trait is found very commonly in people with autism and rarely occurs in people without it."

Spikins and her colleagues detailed the link between detail focus and realistic cave painting in the journal Open Archaeology.

"We looked at the evidence from studies attempting to identify a link between artistic talent and drug use, and found that drugs can only serve to dis-inhibit individuals with a pre-existing ability," Spikins said. "The idea that people with a high degree of detail focus, many of which may have had autism, set a trend for extreme realism in ice age art is a more convincing explanation."

Researchers argue early humans with autistic traits may be responsible for a variety of innovations.

"As well as contributing to early culture, people with the attention to detail needed to paint realistic art would also have had the focus to create complex tools from materials such as bone, rock and wood," Spikins said. "These skills became increasingly important in enabling us to adapt to the harsh environments we encountered in Europe."

Previous research efforts have highlighted commonalities between cave art and art made by modern humans with autism. While other studies have shown key autism genes can be traced to our ape ancestors.


Related: How our ancestors with autistic traits led a revolution in Ice Age art: The ability to focus on detail, a common trait among people with autism, allowed realism to flourish in Ice Age art

Source: Trait tied to autism may explain emergence of realistic art
 
I spent over a decade as an illustrator and designer who was published in several countries in magazines, books and posters (pre computers). I went to formal art school, and always could draw very realistically and quite easily. It just bored the hell out of me, and I worked very hard to stylise and get more abstracted. To challenge myself to do greater, more interesting work. I just thought, why do art that is realistic when one can take a photo instead?

I love the work of the Abstractionists, and “outsider” art. I love Van Gogh. I do love some realism such as Grant Wood, but he added so much to realism that it’s not exactly realism but glorification of the heartland of America back in the 1930s. They show much more creativity and individuality. I had hoped that all autistic people were creative individualists...but I guess not - LOL.
 
I spent over a decade as an illustrator and designer who was published in several countries in magazines, books and posters (pre computers). I went to formal art school, and always could draw very realistically and quite easily. It just bored the hell out of me, and I worked very hard to stylise and get more abstracted. To challenge myself to do greater, more interesting work. I just thought, why do art that is realistic when one can take a photo instead?

I love the work of the Abstractionists, and “outsider” art. I love Van Gogh. I do love some realism such as Grant Wood, but he added so much to realism that it’s not exactly realism but glorification of the heartland of America back in the 1930s. They show much more creativity and individuality. I had hoped that all autistic people were creative individualists...but I guess not - LOL.

Have you been watching Natl Geo's mini-series "Genius" ? This time it's Antonio Banderas playing the part of Pablo Picasso. Fascinating portrayal and man. Though I have no idea how accurate or not this may be. I certainly enjoyed the previous season about Albert Einstein as well.

Interesting question as to what goes on with the thought processes of impressionist painters.
 
Have you been watching Natl Geo's mini-series "Genius" ? This time it's Antonio Banderas playing the part of Pablo Picasso. Fascinating portrayal and man. Though I have no idea how accurate or not this may be. I certainly enjoyed the previous season about Albert Einstein as well.

Interesting question as to what goes on with the thought processes of impressionist painters.

No, I lived tv free since January 2018. I would have surely enjoyed that though. I have the issue of National Geographic on Picasso that recently came out.
 
No, I lived tv free since January 2018. I would have surely enjoyed that though. I have the issue of National Geographic on Picasso that recently came out.

I'm certainly no expert on art. Though in the case of Piccasso I must say that I became much more appreciative of his style after seeing some of his more conventional and traditional paintings. I suppose I could say something similar about Van Gogh as well.

Makes me wonder if this is just another reflection of my being on the spectrum. Or not. Who knows?
 
I have read that many of the impressionist painters had poor eyesight. They were painting what they saw!
 
I hated Picasso “blue period” and convention realism. My favorite Picasso’s are his ceramics, bull themes, and the Guernica.
 
I have read that many of the impressionist painters had poor eyesight. They were painting what they saw!

I read that Cezanne smashed his first pair of glasses
once he looked through them.

When I got mine, as a child, I was surprised to
see that leaves were .. s e p a r a t e.. on the trees.
I had theory prior to that, that somehow bits
just sort of broke off or something...and that
was how leaves happened to be on the ground.

Monet eventually had cataracts and was legally blind.
11 Fascinating Facts About Claude Monet

Through the Eyes of an Artist
Discussion of Monet, Degas, Cezanne and others, regarding
their visual acuity.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom