The Educational Tyranny of the Neurotypicals
My random comments:
This was an interesting read, and I think I agree with pretty much all of it. I would have liked a little more detail, but I guess I should read his PhD dissertation for that. He links to several other articles and books that could be a deep rabbithole of reading.
I've never heard the term "neuroatypical". I'm used to "neurotypical" and "neurodiverse". I wonder if "neuroatypical" is gaining or losing popularity against "neurodiverse". I like "neurodiverse" better, because it contains "diverse" which, to me, implies more openness and more possibilities. Plus, the abbreviation for "neuroatypical" would be NA, which I would read as "not applicable."
He mentions letting children pursue more interest-based learning. He doesn't mention Montessori-style education, but it sounds exactly like that to me. I agree that "sit down, be quiet, and memorize" doesn't work nearly as well as the education system thinks it does for both NDs and NTs. I did well in the "shut up and memorize" environment all the way up to high school. In college, however, I was suddenly required to not just regurgitate memorized facts, but demonstrate mastery of a topic. It was a sudden shock and an eye-opening experience, that first semester. I see the standards my wife has to teach by and I am glad that the educational system is moving (though probably too slowly) toward emphasizing mastery.
This article cites quite a few AS stereotypes - must be good with numbers, schedules, and rules, etc. His main point, though, is that we need as much diversity in teaching as we have in our students. For that point, I'll give him a pass on his stereotypes.
My random comments:
This was an interesting read, and I think I agree with pretty much all of it. I would have liked a little more detail, but I guess I should read his PhD dissertation for that. He links to several other articles and books that could be a deep rabbithole of reading.
I've never heard the term "neuroatypical". I'm used to "neurotypical" and "neurodiverse". I wonder if "neuroatypical" is gaining or losing popularity against "neurodiverse". I like "neurodiverse" better, because it contains "diverse" which, to me, implies more openness and more possibilities. Plus, the abbreviation for "neuroatypical" would be NA, which I would read as "not applicable."
He mentions letting children pursue more interest-based learning. He doesn't mention Montessori-style education, but it sounds exactly like that to me. I agree that "sit down, be quiet, and memorize" doesn't work nearly as well as the education system thinks it does for both NDs and NTs. I did well in the "shut up and memorize" environment all the way up to high school. In college, however, I was suddenly required to not just regurgitate memorized facts, but demonstrate mastery of a topic. It was a sudden shock and an eye-opening experience, that first semester. I see the standards my wife has to teach by and I am glad that the educational system is moving (though probably too slowly) toward emphasizing mastery.
This article cites quite a few AS stereotypes - must be good with numbers, schedules, and rules, etc. His main point, though, is that we need as much diversity in teaching as we have in our students. For that point, I'll give him a pass on his stereotypes.