It depends on the job and the amount of physical work involved. I have done this repeatedly as an exploration geologist. Keeping a crew in the field is expensive, especially if they are not producing due to days off. It is also physically hard, demanding work. Crew burnout was a constant problem, but generally, I loved it.I need alternative views on a situation. I was offered a work project today, to work 45 days in a row at a nuclear power plant. 12 hours of work per day. It sounds beyond exhausting, and from previous experience such a commitment leads to serious burnout.
I could pay my $outhern California rent for 12 months with the money it would bring.
I know I can accomplish the 45 days working 12 hours per day, but I also know the subsequent burnout would be brutal and need at least 3 months of recovery to get back to my version of normal.
I am seriously considering doing it, it is just difficult to decide if my income multiplied by 4 is worth the stress, temporary relocation, and dramatic lifestyle change.
What would you do?
Last edited: