In response to you quoting my post and then stating he is not the problem; as per usual internet forum protocol, my post was based on what the OP posted. I read what the OP had written about her version of events, her experiences and I posted on the basis of that.
No one is trying to change your 'rational opinions or beliefs', you're entitled to your opinion just as others are theirs. Your post however gives the appearance that you believe you're rational and others are not.
Of course there are two sides to the story, I'm not naive either, but we've only been given one side. The OP's. And responses have been given on that basis.
The fact that you dated someone with borderline personality disorder gives the appearance that you are projecting your own experiences onto the OP's partner who you appear to be viewing as a victim.
I did not respond to the OP's partner as he wasn't the one who came to this forum. I responded to the OP. In my view that does not make me irrational.
Thanks for your reply. I already replied to most of these issues, so I will not elaborate more, as it would be repetitive. I will though address the irrational issue. I just have one question for you. Do you think physical abuse against males is funny? If so, why?
The reason I ask is because you were one of the five women who apparently think it is funny. Even if that bf criticized his gf, the op, that does not justify ANY physical abuse. To laugh at such not only encourages her to do such, but it implies women have rights to do such.
It also implies that men who are being physically abused should remain silent as there is no harm in women doing such if they are mad. Now, I can bet that if the roles were reversed and she criticized him, and someone suggested he give her a black eye, you would not be laughing.
That would show irrationality, a belief one side is allowed to abuse, not the other. Again, no criticism justifies any such abuse. Find me a law to support such irrational theory.
Now, as a person who was physically abused growing up, and for every other person here who was such too, that laughter could have been triggering, to see such joking about physical abuse. No criticism justifies physical abuse. I do not expect any of you to admit wrong.
Whenever I am wrong, I will admit so. In this case, I feel there was quick prejudgment that the guy was only at fault. Just because the op did not mention any wrongs she did, it is irrational to assume he is only at fault, when she has a condition considered severe in nature too.
That was my point. For those who disagree with this, I am not sure what to say, other than you are entitled to your opinions. But, where I will say you did wrong, was making fun of a guy if he were to receive a black eye. That is where I strongly differ from those others.
Let me also then ask that follow-up question. Would you five have laughed if someone had said, “Maybe he should give her a black eye (if he had said she was the one actually criticizing him? “ I will await your reply.