• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Any one else here obsessed with physics?

Ok, just thought of this. On one direction of the mobius the limits are c and 0 for relative motion. On the other direction are limits of -c and 0. So looking at any one point of the strip, and its concurrent anti-spin cohort, there is always a zero sum balance.
 
I suppose it is a 1d edge through the 5th spacial dimension which is twisted through the other 4. It spins simultaneously through all the 4d in such a way that it can be expressed as +/- spin, so seems to be moving in both directions relative to outside observers.
 
If you're like me, you can just sort of see it, I have a compulsion to read as much as possible. on the subject.

I have no idea why I like physics. could be genetics. After all share surname with Pieter Zeeman Yet I can find no connection to him.
 
Yes, I see it, and then try to make up the words to explain it. So sometimes I ... worry if I say it in a way that makes sense.
.
I'm very different from everyone in my family. I like so many things different from them, and rarely much the same. Physics is just something I ended up sticking with as a nice brain exercise, and there is an always growing list of observed phenomena and theoretical breakthroughs. :)
 
Checked Peter Woits blog this morning surprised to see comment on ChatGPT generated article on two parallel universes. being very similar to each other. See my previous comments.
 
Just got back from watching the movie Oppenheimer looks like it's becoming a block buste. Well, done accurate.
if you told me a few days ago I would be taking my wife to a movie about a physics celebrity. I Would not believe it.
 
Ronald Zeeman said:
Just got back from watching the movie Oppenheimer looks like it's becoming a block buste. Well, done accurate.
if you told me a few days ago I would be taking my wife to a movie about a physics celebrity. I Would not believe it.
Click to expand...
I really liked the movie. I figured they wouldn’t get into much about the science and how brilliant he was.Figured it was going to be about the McCarthy era, destroying reputable people. But it’s ok maybe got some people to think about things . Christopher Nolans style is really amazing.
 
I lay the issue of Oppenheimer's loss of his security clearance on three people, William Liscum Borden who went to that flaming transvestite, J Edgar Hoover with a tale of Oppenheimer being a Soviet spy, Hoover, himself, who put his thumb on the scales of justice by refusing Oppenheimer's defense team security clearances, and Edward Teller who clearly libeled Oppenheimer merely because he disagreed with priorities. Nobel Prize-winning physicist Isidor I. Rabi said that “It would have been a better world without Teller.” Hoover warred against Oppenheimer and his family refusing a security clearance to his daughter to work at the UN as a trilingual translator.
 
Starting to watch u-tube videos produced by Kathy joseph. excellent biographies on prominent physicists and mathematicians she goes back to original sources and papers real eye openers, when it comes to history nuance matters.
 
Kathy showed me that Maxwell wrote his paper in mathematics using octonions. AS he was familiar with Hamiltons.
math maybe if more physicists were aware of this less time would be spent on string theory. To me going back to the beginning of the maze. Reach a dead end start over at the beginning. Or at least if you reach a fork and take the wrong leg go back to the fork and take the other leg.
 
"Any one else here obsessed with physics"

I was a Physicist in the Air Force. Does that count?
 
Jumpinbare said:
"Any one else here obsessed with physics"

I was a Physicist in the Air Force. Does that count?
Click to expand...
What discipline? I got into the application side of things through radiopharmaceutical manufacturing when I found that I had proficiency designing reactor and cyclotron targetry and processing systems. I have two patents for target processing.
 
One of my workmates understudied with me to learn the industry just prior to retirement had a master in physics she specialized in optics we became good friends had fun teaching her about industrial colour control. paints and inks.
currently she works in customer service in sales support. Incidentally my youngest brother is in the Canadian air force, reserves Electrical Technologist.
 
Watched a few u-tube videos on Richard Feynman noticed he is a highly. visual thinker. used a visual demonstration.
to show why the space shuttle O-rings failed with a glass of cold water. When I got a new position at an automotive assembly line, the first thing I did as the position involved treatment systems. was ask them what the biggest issue was in the plant. they stated it was paint chipping off during the assembly process which then had to be touched up.
My then said I know how to fix this, Give me a blank steel untreated panel hang it on the line take it off after it gets e-coated, then bring it over. I took the panel, treated and painted bent it in half showed it to them, all the paint including the treatment had completely peeled off. Took a year fixed plant. That's how you do it both of us are Aspies he just more educated same gift.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom