Overlooking the insult here, I myself can understand the logical coherence in postulating the existence of an ultimate, transcendent and non-contingent explanation for why there is what there is. It need not be any of the traditional 'gods' (in fact, I would be really surprised if any of those gods did turn out to be real), but rather what some have referred to as an ultimate ground of being. That is, the point at which one can say that the necessity for finding an explanation that circumvents the infinite regress issue regarding possible explanations, is satisfied.
Those who believe physical reality to be all there is or could possibly be, are engaging in serious intellectual overreach. In spite of what S. Hawking may believe (i.e. "philosophy is dead" - The Grand Design) the question itself is one that only philosophy and logic can actually address, the methodology of science being - by design - an inappropriate tool for the task. Yet... so many believe that if 'science' says this or that, then that is that. No, it isn't. 'Science' does not ever say anything: scientists, on the other hand, do, and being human they are susceptible to all of the flaws that everyone else is susceptible to, such as bias. The method of science was developed to overcome this inadequacy, but it also isn't perfect (although, in my own personal opinion, it is the best method of uncovering the truth we have). However, even having said this, I realise that other disciplines, like philosophy, are intrinsically valuable for their own reasons, and I believe it is extremely important to not fall into the (once again, philosophical) trap of scientism.
Yes, 'Aspies' do tend to be more logical than most people, but there is so much more to us than just logic. We are not automatons, or shallow cariacatures like Spock or Sheldon Cooper, and yet for some weird reason the majority on this planet expect us to behave the way they do. Fascinating, as Spock might say.
My apologies, I intended no insult, and I'm sorry if what I said came across as one. To me clear, just because I can't understand does not mean I think less of the people who think or behave in a the way I can't understand. I know well that people of intelligence and education can be deeply religious, and I respect that and am glad that they gain something from their beliefs even if it makes no sense to me.
I certainly is odd that some people expect us to fit the cliché that the media portrays, but alas stereotyping is common and will probably continue to be for a very long time.