danjustlovescoffee
Member
Have you ever been told that a specific difficulty you had was due to ASD but later found that even NT people had the same difficulty?
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Have you ever been told that a specific difficulty you had was due to ASD but later found that even NT people had the same difficulty?
I really think that holistic approaches are the best. You can't really isolate an issue since they often work together in order to mess things up. It is the same for NT people although they have their NT issues.Absolutely. It is this very phenomenon that allows people to minimize your situation. "Ohhh,...everybody has had that happen." Well, that MAY be true, but if that specific difficulty is pervasive,...then it's not a once in a while thing to be ignored. There is a long list of potential traits, signs and symptoms of autism,...take one or a few of these,...isolate them, and a neurotypical will likely have some of these issues. On the other hand, take 10-20 things, make them pervasive, combine them into one person,...you've got another situation.
I have commented recently on a YouTube video from a well-known psychologist and marriage counselor how Asperger's may be simply a form of neurodiversity. As well-meaning as that may seem, it also is highly minimizing given the 100 or so, sensory, motor, and intellectual difficulties I deal with on a daily basis. Yes, autism is A form of neurodiversity,...many of us are "out-of-the box" thinkers, and that can be a good thing,...but don't try to pass autism off as simply that. It's much, much more.
I have also pointed out in other threads here, that there is a common difficulty with autistics called "theory of mind", some may call it "mind blindness",...but basically it is the difficulty or inability to take another's perspective. "How would it feel if I did that to you?" YET,...because most neurotypicals, most of the time operate on an emotional level, and just react,...they too, are less likely to take another's perspective. We see this in all sorts of reactionary statements on social media sites, in politics, etc. Personally, once an autistic is self-aware of their situation, they are more likely to intellectually pause and consider perspective before reacting,...so I am not sure, if from a daily functioning perspective, there is much difference. Granted, I have much intellectual practice with this as I do work with the public, but I have found that with my personal life,...knowing my wife for 38 years,...and still have zero idea what is going in her head,...I've just accepted that. Perhaps I am just fooling myself when dealing with the public and I truly don't have a clue.
"Theory of mind" is a failed theory in my opinion. This idea is trotted out to dehumanize autistics, not to understand them.
The world is full of war, rape, murder, child abuse, spousal abuse, elder abuse..I could keep going and never find an end to all the ways humans are horrible to one another. Yet, somehow, autistics "lack empathy" or the ability to understand from anothers perspective? Crap "science" to gain attention, nothing more!
In fact, the whole idea is so lacking in empathy that one wonders if the scientist who postulated that idea wasn't a sociopath. "Physician, heal thyself!"
That diminishes some lived experience. I was ASD at a time when ASD was rarely diagnosed, but with my intelligence people thought I was normal and offered no help. Blind to social communication I had intense social anxiety, though my social desires were the same as anybody's. As a consequence I was isolated.Pay attention and you'll witness some things that everyone will have difficulty with from time to time. The main difference I believe will be your attitude in handling it.
So, with respect to the autism literature, at least from my interpretation, is that it has been identified that most,...not all,...neurotypicals,...in a calm, rational, state of mind,...will exhibit cognitive empathy and be able to "put themselves in another's shoes". On the other hand, it has been identified that many autistics,...not all,...lack this ability. Personally,...it is quite clear I don't have this ability. I am very self-conscious of this fact,...so, intellectually, I do sometimes have to pause,...perhaps ask some critical questions,...gather my information,...then react. Which also means I cannot allow my emotional state to dictate what I say and do,...which takes an incredible amount of self discipline and puts in a built-in delay in my responses to others
Welcome to the club. My wife gets irritated because "I take too long" to respond. Or there will be a "long pause" in the middle of my saying something and she'll start talking in the middle of what I'm saying. I've actually timed it and the longest she'll wait for me to continue before jumping in - either to start talking herself or to to demand I "get to the point" - is about 2 seconds and I can see her getting antsy before that. We've been married 35 years and she still does it. The length of an "appropriate" gap in a conversation must be very difficult to unlearn.One one level I do agree with you with respect to "all the ways humans are horrible to one another". Absolutely, there are psychopaths and sociopaths out there. There are people, who have had their amygdala triggered, and no matter how much rational thought you present to them, they are going to dehumanize a group of people. This is a strategy used in propaganda and military training,...treat them, "the enemy", as something other than human and you can do all sorts of horrible things to them. There are also a lot of "beta males" out there that,...out of fear and insecurities (amygdala again),...will want to control and intimidate, will do all sorts of mind games to make you feel somehow "less than". Bullies. In situations were fear and anxiety (amygdala again) overrule rational thought, the concept of another's perspective is bypassed,...and selfish behaviors are triggered. In all of these situations the processing centers for "cognitive empathy" have been bypassed.
So, with respect to the autism literature, at least from my interpretation, is that it has been identified that most,...not all,...neurotypicals,...in a calm, rational, state of mind,...will exhibit cognitive empathy and be able to "put themselves in another's shoes". On the other hand, it has been identified that many autistics,...not all,...lack this ability. Personally,...it is quite clear I don't have this ability. I am very self-conscious of this fact,...so, intellectually, I do sometimes have to pause,...perhaps ask some critical questions,...gather my information,...then react. Which also means I cannot allow my emotional state to dictate what I say and do,...which takes an incredible amount of self discipline and puts in a built-in delay in my responses to others.
When we try to see ourselves from anther person's perspective we often fail. The reason for this is we don't know the other person's perspective, we can only imagine it. Our imagination is limited to what we know and what we've learned. Our imagination automatically tells us what we would do if we were in their shoes. So an NT looks at an ND and imagines why an NT would behave like an autistic person behaves - and it is usually not pretty. An ND looks at an NT's behavior and is at a loss, declaring it irrational - or worse.I've been thinking on this a lot today. The problem is, of course, one doesn't know what one doesn't know.
Thinking back over my experiences when I was younger, I think I could not always put myself in others shoes but I wasn't without empathy. I couldn't understand my mothers perspective until I was in my 30s for example. But how could I do so when she wasn't forth coming with any part of her experience and I had no experience of my own to relate with. I assume that is just what "growing up" does- personal experience broadens perspective.
Still, I have been called a narcissist and I assumed this was a baseless insult. But, as I said, I don't know what I don't know. Perhaps I miss the point entirely.
I could not put myself in another person's perspective unless I experienced something similar, but when I did it led to odd behavior in trying to be social. So I learned to distrust such feelings.I've been thinking on this a lot today. The problem is, of course, one doesn't know what one doesn't know.
Thinking back over my experiences when I was younger, I think I could not always put myself in others shoes but I wasn't without empathy. I couldn't understand my mothers perspective until I was in my 30s for example. But how could I do so when she wasn't forth coming with any part of her experience and I had no experience of my own to relate with. I assume that is just what "growing up" does- personal experience broadens perspective.
Still, I have been called a narcissist and I assumed this was a baseless insult. But, as I said, I don't know what I don't know. Perhaps I miss the point entirely.
Exactly! This is the point I want to reach as I process my past.The solution is to simply accept that there are reasons for why people do what they do and it doesn't matter that we don't
understand it. If you relax and stop fighting over what is logical or who is better, then you can start to learn.
I could not put myself in another person's perspective unless I experienced something similar, but when I did it led to odd behavior in trying to be social. So I learned to distrust such feelings.
Not the kind of stuff they would be willing to share, so obviously it's wrong to do so. And maybe it feels uncomfortable to hear your experiences. They'd probably be happier if you shared traditionally NT stuff.