Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
What was the source of this information? Your courts ? I know some jurisdictions have specific laws disqualifying people with "mental disorders". (Their term, not mine.)I just learned at my autistic meetup that I do not have to serve in jury duty. I was like wow. Sometimes autism has its perks. I want this thread to be positive. What is something positive about your experience with autism?
I have to agree. I would not like to have a persons life in my hands like that. It would be so hard to follow and make sure to remember every single detail. I would be so confused.Frankly I find it disturbing to think that if any of us were charged with a crime, that an exclusive NT jury would not entirely represent "our peers".
That's true, in California you can't so easily opt out as a potential juror. And it does vary from state-to-state.
But it's also true that when you do serve in such a capacity, the possibility of you destroying one's life in whole or in part depending on how they are sentenced. It's an awesome responsibility, I suppose one that's not for everyone whether NT or ND.
https://www.putchildrenfirst.org/aspergers-and-jury-duty-when-its-possible-and-when-its-not
We sent an elderly man to prison for the remainder of his life. Convicted of attempted murder. Under circumstances that made his conviction easy. His legal defense by a public defender was pathetic.I have to agree. I would not like to have a persons life in my hands like that. It would be so hard to follow and make sure to remember every single detail. I would be so confused.
True. OTOH, I wouldn’t want to be judged by a group made up of people who are comfortable making those decisions.Frankly I find it disturbing to think that if any of us were charged with a crime, that an exclusive NT jury would not entirely represent "our peers".
That's true, in California you can't so easily opt out as a potential juror. And it does vary from state-to-state.
But it's also true that when you do serve in such a capacity, the possibility of you destroying one's life in whole or in part depending on how they are sentenced. It's an awesome responsibility, I suppose one that's not for everyone whether NT or ND.
https://www.putchildrenfirst.org/aspergers-and-jury-duty-when-its-possible-and-when-its-not
My impression serving on each jury over some years reflected people who weren't comfortable in the least in making such decisions. But that it was a duty as a citizen that had to be done and we did it.True. OTOH, I wouldn’t want to be judged by a group made up of people who are comfortable making those decisions.
Sort of like my wife, she really likes my ability to resolve real life puzzles even the Mickey mouse ones relationship games with her girlfriends showing her their real motives. silly games using deceit.Being on the spectrum has made me more empathic as an adult. I also realized l really like ND men, l really don't like NT men.
And that, I think, is how it ought to be. Maybe I sound like an old geez griping ‘this new generation’, but my observation is that, these days, people are gratified to render judgment based on an ‘emotional reaction of the month’. There seems to be a real satisfaction in rendering life-altering judgment, especially of the ludicrously moral sort, as though it were an emotionally satisfying payback of personal grievance. So, here’s to you and them and the good ol’ days.My impression serving on each jury over some years reflected people who weren't comfortable in the least in making such decisions. But that it was a duty as a citizen that had to be done and we did it.