Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
No.Have you ever come across people displaying psychopathic traits or other signs of antisocial behavior? Did you experience a sense of recognition or connection, as if you were meeting someone similar to yourself? What was your personal experience in such situations?
As a rule, such behavior is not always characteristic of highly functional individuals; outwardly, they may demonstrate a high degree of politeness. My question is based on the fact that both of the mentioned disorders are considered neurodivergences, and their carriers are typically marked by low empathy and high intelligence.No.
People who display anger or act excessively rude in public tend to scare me. Also, people who backstab or manipulate people.
I'm more likely to feel a connection to the one being hurt.
No....Did you experience a sense of recognition or connection, as if you were meeting someone similar to yourself? What was your personal experience in such situations?
I dont see anger as automatically "antisocial" or "psychopathic" -- public or not....it depends on context.People who display anger or act excessively rude in public tend to scare me.
No, this is primarily an innate condition; a normal person who was subjected to abuse in childhood often develops social phobia and becomes withdrawn.I think you'd find that people who exhibit psychopathic traits and antisocial behavior were bullied or abused when they were younger, which led to negative perceptions and a lack of empathy for others. If bad things happened to you, I can see how you would relate to them.
There are a wide varieties of ways people respond to abuse.No, this is primarily an innate condition; a normal person who was subjected to abuse in childhood often develops social phobia and becomes withdrawn.
Science clearly shows that childhood maltreatment, abuse, and trauma contribute to antisocial personality disorder. It's not an innate condition.No, this is primarily an innate condition; a normal person who was subjected to abuse in childhood often develops social phobia and becomes withdrawn.
Twin and family studies indicate that the heritability of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) ranges from 40% to 70%. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that ASPD is determined exclusively by genetics, nor can its occurrence be attributed solely to upbringing factorsScience clearly shows that childhood maltreatment, abuse, and trauma contribute to antisocial personality disorder. It's not an innate condition.
Here's an example from one of many papers you can find on Science Direct and other academic journals:
The etiology of antisocial personality disorder: The differential roles of adverse childhood experiences and childhood psychopathology
Using prospective longitudinal data, Fergusson, Boden, and Horwood [33] examined the association between childhood sexual abuse, childhood physical abuse, and ASPD and found that the prevalence of ASPD at ages 18–21 and 21–25 was two to four times greater among those that had been sexually abused compared to those who had not. Similarly, those who experienced regular physical abuse or severe physical abuse had ASPD at a prevalence that was two to seven times higher than those who were not physically abused.
The problem I experience is that I really am blind to "intent" and "hidden meaning". It really puts me in a disadvantaged position.Have you ever come across people displaying psychopathic traits or other signs of antisocial behavior? Did you experience a sense of recognition or connection, as if you were meeting someone similar to yourself? What was your personal experience in such situations?
Another method is watching films and interviews with such people. I have developed certain impressions that I subconsciously associate with psychopathic tendencies. In particular, extraversion, sociability, a constant playful mood often accompanied by a loud, almost announcer-like manner of speaking, as well as prominent facial featuresThere have been times when I can watch a YouTube video of how to identify these individuals... and I think I do OK in that scenario.
Twin studies prove ASPD is not innate. If it were a genetic condition, there would be a 100% concordance rate in identical twins.Twin and family studies indicate that the heritability of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) ranges from 40% to 70%.
Genetics influences the risk of nearly every physical and mental health conditions despite only causing around 1% of them. The environment often plays a large role, with genes playing a lesser, secondary role with each gene slightly contributing to risk in a variety of ways. For example, if genes caused a baby to be more sensitive, that baby might cry and scream more often, which might stress out his parents and affect their ability to sleep, resulting in more negative interactions that wouldn't have occurred if the baby was less sensitive. If this happened in ASPD, the cause could be the upbringing, with genes merely increasing the likelihood of a more negative upbringing.Therefore, it cannot be claimed that ASPD is determined exclusively by genetics, nor can its occurrence be attributed solely to upbringing factors
I don’t understand why you are trying to justify them. History shows that many criminals with sadistic tendencies grew up in families far from dysfunctional and had no obvious psychological traumas. Your eagerness to defend such people suggests hidden personal reasons or perhaps complexesTwin studies prove ASPD is not innate. If it were a genetic condition, there would be a 100% concordance rate in identical twins.
I have no idea how you interpreted my response as justifying criminals that you believe are born with sadistic tendencies. I simply posted the science, which shows that ASPD is not genetic and that upbringing plays a major role. Psychological traumas aren't always obvious to outsiders and dysfunctional families sometimes hide it well (or don't even realize how dysfunctional they are). For someone who appears to reject science, your accusation of me having hidden personal reasoning is interesting.I don’t understand why you are trying to justify them. History shows that many criminals with sadistic tendencies grew up in families far from dysfunctional and had no obvious psychological traumas. Your eagerness to defend such people suggests hidden personal reasons or perhaps complexes
Pay attention to the rest of his message. He just tried to explain to you how the mechanism works without dysfunctional family or obvious psychological traumas.History shows that many criminals with sadistic tendencies grew up in families far from dysfunctional and had no obvious psychological traumas.
A psyche can be broken by almost anything. In essence, it is impossible to fully avoid traumatizing a fragile child’s mind.Psychological traumas
Parents are supposed to pay attention to their child's emotional state, help them understand their emotions, and respond in ways that resolve their distress and promote mental wellness. Not doing that is called emotional neglect, which can occur when parents have low emotional intelligence. Emotional neglect can lead to numerous mental/emotional problems, which therapists can treat by doing what their parents failed to do. Of course, sometimes, due to genetic influences that I explained earlier, even parents with average emotional intelligence may not be able to understand their children and adequately address their needs.A psyche can be broken by almost anything. In essence, it is impossible to fully avoid traumatizing a fragile child’s mind.
I no longer have any desire to continue this discussion. Your arguments do not seem convincing to me. Many psychologists, and even people with psychopathic traits themselves (and I don’t necessarily mean maniacs), have emphasized in their accounts that they were born with these traits and did not experience any serious psychological traumas. I know quite a few people who seemed to have everything necessary for a happy life, yet they still turned out the way they are.Parents are supposed to pay attention to their child's emotional state, help them understand their emotions, and respond in ways that resolve their distress and promote mental wellness. Not doing that is called emotional neglect, which can occur when parents have low emotional intelligence. Emotional neglect can lead to numerous mental/emotional problems, which therapists can treat by doing what their parents failed to do. Of course, sometimes, due to genetic influences that I explained earlier, even parents with average emotional intelligence may not be able to understand their children and adequately address their needs.
I posted and explained the science, not my own arguments. If science doesn't convince you, nothing will.I no longer have any desire to continue this discussion. Your arguments do not seem convincing to me. Many psychologists, and even people with psychopathic traits themselves (and I don’t necessarily mean maniacs), have emphasized in their accounts that they were born with these traits and did not experience any serious psychological traumas. I know quite a few people who seemed to have everything necessary for a happy life, yet they still turned out the way they are.