Soup
Well-Known Member
A lot to think about here in this thread! While I can see where, as a man Lisbeth Salander might appeal to you, you're looking from a revenge perspective (think back to the power/vengence driven Lex Luthor) I can even stretch my mind & see where she would appeal to some women too as an outsider underdog who takes back what she believes is hers.
However, the concept that any woman NT or Aspie (you know how most of us don't like being touched!) would bounce back that way from such a vicious sexual assault & go on to plot revenge, is a fantasy that misrepresents the impact sexual assaults have on women with Asperger's. Women who are perceived to have a disability are many more times more likely to become victims of sexual assault than those the avg woman. the exact numbers vary from 1 culture to another, but the fact remains a constant.
While the Dr.Reid 'Bones' types are more 'positive' in that they're less threatening than the Aspie-like serial killer, hunched over in his lair full of technological gizmos, intent on causing massive harm, they're a distortion that utterly minimizes the impact Asperger's has on many who live with it. Many real Aspies have been turned into pill heads by the medical system's attempts to cram us into round holes. The anxiety & depression are caused by having to constantly deal with this ill fit than anything intrinsically wrong with the Aspie. I've been handed prescriptions for all sorts of potent drugs some of which are highly addictive (a BAD idea considering many Aspies' obsessive tendencies) some of which have terrifying potential side effects (all the more likely to occur because of my small size) & some that will cause more problems than they treat. Happily, I had the good logical sense to ignore these dismissive condescending doctors & run the prescriptions through our paper shredder!
Real life Lisbeth Salanders don't bounce back from rape/torture experiences: they're frequently reduced to becoming wandering homeless babbling addicts. There are several like this in our city whose cases we saw in class & who lost what little connexion they had to real people & what little trust they had. Most NT women are utterly shattered by such experiences & go on to live dysfunctional lives even when they receive support & therapy AND the guy goes to prison.
Media distortions & stereotypes affected many different 'out' groups: Black men are grossly disproportionately depicted as violent street-type criminals, then some became tokenized in idealistic roles pundits who study this stuff say reflect white society's need to feel like that bad racism is over & all is well now. Asian men were (& largely remain) depicted as kung fu masters (really? how many truly are?) or as brilliant doctor/scientist types:sexless guys who NEVER EVER 'get' the girl. Consider the Asian psychiatrist on Law & Order: it wasn't enough to give him a bad haircut & make him a super-smart doctor: he's also both gay AND a celibate priest! Why not just castrate him & be done with it: does the spectre of a very smart Asian really need to be so overcompensated for in order to make White America comfortable? Why are so many Asian women stereotyped as submissive sex kittens out to snag a white man OR they're fierce scary but beautiful 'dragon ladies'?
As a person representing Neurodiversity, I must ask the same critical questions I do when examining stereotypes of Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Jews & other 'types' of people in mass media imagery. The BIG question is: WHOSE INTERESTS DO THESE REPRESENTATIONS SERVE? the next question is: FROM WHOSE PERSPECTIVE IS THIS PERSON BEING DEPICTED?
Usually, the answer to the 1st question is to reinforce the current social trends of belief held by the status-quo majority in the society in which they are presented. The answer to the second is that the viewer is expected to look through the eyes of the 'status quo' most enfranchised group within the society in question because their perspective is the one that is both valid & valued.
If an image of someone is a distortion meant to make someone else feel secure because their belief system has been affirmed, then I reject it. If it is designed to minimize the impact of something that has serious consequences for those living with it (whatever that IT may be) then I de-bunk it. If it is designed to make the viewer feel superior to & better in some important socially valued way that the person being shown, then I suspect & critique it.
However, the concept that any woman NT or Aspie (you know how most of us don't like being touched!) would bounce back that way from such a vicious sexual assault & go on to plot revenge, is a fantasy that misrepresents the impact sexual assaults have on women with Asperger's. Women who are perceived to have a disability are many more times more likely to become victims of sexual assault than those the avg woman. the exact numbers vary from 1 culture to another, but the fact remains a constant.
While the Dr.Reid 'Bones' types are more 'positive' in that they're less threatening than the Aspie-like serial killer, hunched over in his lair full of technological gizmos, intent on causing massive harm, they're a distortion that utterly minimizes the impact Asperger's has on many who live with it. Many real Aspies have been turned into pill heads by the medical system's attempts to cram us into round holes. The anxiety & depression are caused by having to constantly deal with this ill fit than anything intrinsically wrong with the Aspie. I've been handed prescriptions for all sorts of potent drugs some of which are highly addictive (a BAD idea considering many Aspies' obsessive tendencies) some of which have terrifying potential side effects (all the more likely to occur because of my small size) & some that will cause more problems than they treat. Happily, I had the good logical sense to ignore these dismissive condescending doctors & run the prescriptions through our paper shredder!
Real life Lisbeth Salanders don't bounce back from rape/torture experiences: they're frequently reduced to becoming wandering homeless babbling addicts. There are several like this in our city whose cases we saw in class & who lost what little connexion they had to real people & what little trust they had. Most NT women are utterly shattered by such experiences & go on to live dysfunctional lives even when they receive support & therapy AND the guy goes to prison.
Media distortions & stereotypes affected many different 'out' groups: Black men are grossly disproportionately depicted as violent street-type criminals, then some became tokenized in idealistic roles pundits who study this stuff say reflect white society's need to feel like that bad racism is over & all is well now. Asian men were (& largely remain) depicted as kung fu masters (really? how many truly are?) or as brilliant doctor/scientist types:sexless guys who NEVER EVER 'get' the girl. Consider the Asian psychiatrist on Law & Order: it wasn't enough to give him a bad haircut & make him a super-smart doctor: he's also both gay AND a celibate priest! Why not just castrate him & be done with it: does the spectre of a very smart Asian really need to be so overcompensated for in order to make White America comfortable? Why are so many Asian women stereotyped as submissive sex kittens out to snag a white man OR they're fierce scary but beautiful 'dragon ladies'?
As a person representing Neurodiversity, I must ask the same critical questions I do when examining stereotypes of Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Jews & other 'types' of people in mass media imagery. The BIG question is: WHOSE INTERESTS DO THESE REPRESENTATIONS SERVE? the next question is: FROM WHOSE PERSPECTIVE IS THIS PERSON BEING DEPICTED?
Usually, the answer to the 1st question is to reinforce the current social trends of belief held by the status-quo majority in the society in which they are presented. The answer to the second is that the viewer is expected to look through the eyes of the 'status quo' most enfranchised group within the society in question because their perspective is the one that is both valid & valued.
If an image of someone is a distortion meant to make someone else feel secure because their belief system has been affirmed, then I reject it. If it is designed to minimize the impact of something that has serious consequences for those living with it (whatever that IT may be) then I de-bunk it. If it is designed to make the viewer feel superior to & better in some important socially valued way that the person being shown, then I suspect & critique it.