I am not sure what to think about this. FDA cites hair-based autism diagnostic aid as ‘breakthrough’ | Spectrum | Autism Research News
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Ah big Pharma rubbing their hands in avarice, its a load crap ,a nt baby living in an area of badly filtered water supply ,could be off the scale for mercury etcI am not sure what to think about this. FDA cites hair-based autism diagnostic aid as ‘breakthrough’ | Spectrum | Autism Research News
I haven’t looked at these studies, but I definitely found them on Google Scholar.Everyone: Go to Google Scholar. Type in the phrase "autism and hair analysis". You will see several studies from several researchers on the topic.
I don't have time read all these right now,...off to work,...but likely will when I can. From what I can gather quickly, though, it suggests that there may be altered heavy metal metabolism in autistics that lead to an accumulation of various heavy metals within the hair. I would have to further study whether or not heavy metal accumulation occurs within the tissues and predisposes autistics to cancers, and such,...which I am not aware of.
Keep in mind, autism starts prenatally,...so don't let this information suggest that it was the heavy metal accumulation that caused the autism,...but rather, autism, itself, is not just a condition of the brain, but other organs, as well,... altering certain metabolic pathways, and may result in this heavy metal accumulation.
To be continued....
Although this test isn't an in utero test, it's simply a fact that an in utero autism test, if there is one, would result in an untold number of future autistics never being born (they'd be aborted in many cases). If that happens, good luck with the future of the world, World...
Similarly, I agree in regards to the test referenced in this thread or other such tests that they very likely could be damaging to autistic people.
Oh, right. When I had heavy metal testing from one dr, another dr smirked and ripped him a new one, telling me it was fake science and bogus data.
And NOW the FDA says it's good? Who is paying them now? Does Pfizer have a brand new test about to marketed, one that MUST be performed on all children, no all people, everyone! And now!!
Although this test isn't an in utero test, it's simply a fact that an in utero autism test, if there is one, would result in an untold number of future autistics never being born (they'd be aborted in many cases). If that happens, good luck with the future of the world, World...
Similarly, I agree in regards to the test referenced in this thread or other such tests that they very likely could be damaging to autistic people.
I am not sure what to think about this. FDA cites hair-based autism diagnostic aid as ‘breakthrough’ | Spectrum | Autism Research News
I know. I ignored the second dr and did the treatments. It helped a lot and set me on a better path. I just found it very rich that some idiot degraded the first dr who was excellent.Pull up the studies. They are from all over the world. Multiple researchers. But,...the bottom line is that this is an "associated" finding in a percentage of autistics. Two, there is simple treatment for heavy metal detoxification.
All the studies have shown is an "associated" finding in a percentage of autistics. Most likely to some individuals having either the missing genes and/or the metabolic redox status that results in an accumulation of heavy metals. Right now, there is no data to suggest, even in the most dystopian of societies, to consider abortion based upon some prenatal testing,...the statistics only show about 36% of autistics in their sampling to have these findings,...in other words, 64% do not. Besides, heavy metal detoxification is possible with simple treatments.
Do you mean there's no data to suggest abortion based on some prenatal testing for autism or do you mean there's no data to suggest abortion based on some prenatal testing for other things as well? A big reason amnios are done is to identify abnormalities and then give the option (perhaps even subtly suggest?) to "terminate the pregnancy". Do mean we're not dystopian enough at this point in regards to autism (but are for other conditions such as Down Syndrome, etc).