Slithytoves
Oblique Strategist
Thank you for expanding on that idea. That is truly an essential distinction that needs to be made if you want something more than a companionable relationship. I wish I had done that sooner in life, but I'm always a bit slow on developing, while wanting so much to experience the deeper experiences in life.
That harmonic relationship I think is the key. In my case, it was something that couldn't progress beyond close friendship (with a couple very intense physical interactions, not sex). I'm sure it would have had it's share of chaos and fire, but it seems that it would be the best for the deepest exploration of each other. Not to say that other forms wouldn't lead to deeper understanding and deeper love, just that it seems to me to transcend the practical and erotic forms.
I feel your pain with the slow development. I labored under the delusion that intense Eros was a necessary prelude to long-term love for many years, fueled by the arts and entertainment that we're raised on. I assumed that if the passion of early romance was strong enough, Eros would spontaneously transmutate into a more sustainable form. I'd bet this is a common error. It wasn't until I'd made a choice to give up on relationships altogether that I stepped back and made an academic exercise of understanding what love is about. Before then, unfortunately, I misunderstood studying the nature of love as being akin to overthinking it, which popular wisdom advises us not to do in relationships. So much for popular wisdom!
I agree that the harmonic relationship is key. It's a lot harder to describe, and nothing like it appears in classifications of love modi operandi by the likes of psychologist John Lee, from whom I borrowed the terms and definitions of Eros and Pragma. If you can forgive my getting a little New Agey, the intellectual and emotional vibration you describe seems to happen at either a very high or very low psychic frequency that can be hard for us to read. That's how I see it, anyway. But that may be why it can be so haunting. I don't think it's meant to be understood; just felt. The challenge is to tune into it but not interfere in any way. I think it takes some courage and great trust between partners to do that. Not every couple is capable of that level of intimacy, or that level of restraint. I also don't think that element is enough for a real-world relationship to survive on, just by itself.
My favorite quote about love comes from poet Antoine de Saint-Exupéry: “Love does not consist of gazing at each other, but in looking outward together in the same direction.” This, to me anyway, signifies a need for pragmatic love as underlying support for that harmonic vibration, which is all about facing inward. Just my own thoughts on the subject. It's a fun topic to explore.