I would use to speak this way, but as me being a software developer, people have different preference and needs. Something that you like someone else might not like.
I recognize that the Mac desktop is a very good choice for people who want to use a computer, but stay totally isolated from having to learn how one actually works. I recommend it to friends looking for precisely that. However, in this case, the poster was complaining about his/her iPad and I was offering an alternative.
Part of the advantage of having an experienced tech wizard on the forum is that somebody like me can offer
informed advice and back it up with real-world facts. Apple has a devoted following - the rest of us call it the iCult - that has been built up over the years, particularly by the late Steve Jobs. Once he had somebody in his fold as an iCultist, he was able to sell second-tier technology for a huge markup (Job's rule was that there always be a minimum of a 50% profit margin - which is obscenely high). But, Jobs was not above peddling obsolete technology as the hottest new thing - and lying about the technology a given device implemented. For example, the iPhone 4 and 4S were both hyped as having a 1 GHz processor and yet having superior battery life to Androids with 1 GHz processors. True as far as it went, however (and this is a huge however with raisins and cinnamon on it!), he achieved this battery life by "underclocking" the 1 GHz processor to run 20% slower - at 800 MHz. Imagine if a car company was advertising an 8-cylinder car that got the same gas mileage as other brands' 6-cylinder cars. So you pay the extra for the more powerful engine and never are told that the way they got an 8-cylinder engine to get gas mileage comparable to a 6 was that they were secretly selling the car with 2 cylinders disconnected. So, in reality, you were running on 6 cylinders while you paid extra for (what you thought was) a gas-saving 8. All of Jobs' snake oil is a bait and switch.
Andy Hertzfeld was a close friend and schoolmate of mine who dropped out of college to join Apple in the pre-Mac days. He was the primary designer of the original Lisa/Mac desktop in the mid 1980s. He was the number 3 person at Apple in those days. He even used to double date with Jobs when Jobs was going out with Joan Baez (folksinger of the era). By 1986, Andy was so sick of Jobs' crooked and underhanded sales machinations that he quit Apple and has never touched an iProduct since. He had his own company for years and now works for Google. One story Andy told me at a convention in 1991 was about an early design meeting for the Mac (actually, Jobs stole virtually the entire Mac desktop from an earlier prototype he saw 5 years earlier at Xerox PARC - Palo Alto Research Center). The design team were debating to go with a 2-button mouse or a Sun-style 3-button mouse. Jobs overruled them and went with the 1-button mouse. His reason was that he was aiming the Mac at a completely non-tech audience, the sort of people who, Jobs joked, couldn't be depended on to tell left from right. Jobs always had that contempt for his own customers.
Another example. The iPhone 6 Plus is - finally - the first iPhone to be able to record and play back full 1080p resolution HDTV video. The iPhone 6 can't even do it (it is restricted to 720p). My last generation Samsung Galaxy S4 was 1080p capable, as was my Droid RAZR MAXX before that and my Droid BIONIC before that. All of these are one to three generations out of date, but Apple is just barely beginning to incorporate the features. Though I use an S5, I still use my S4. The S4 has a quad-core processor running at 2.5 GHz compared to the iPhone 6 Plus's duo-core clocked at 1.9 GHz. The S4 has twice the RAM of the Plus (the S5 has three times the RAM). My wife's Galaxy S3 - now several generations old - has better specs in every category and stronger capabilities than the brand new iPhone 6 - and it is somewhere around 3 years old.
However, the real kicker is that Apple keeps its source code secret and proprietary - where Android is open-source - and Apple phones can not be "rooted," which gives the user access to the kernel level directories where both spyware and bloatware are located. So, by rooting an Android, you can remove the spyware that is reporting every keystroke and every incoming text and email to your provider. You can also recover precious internal storage by removeing bloatware (and precious performance improvements by not having bloatware running in background). Yo can tune your processors to run faster if needed (lowering battery life) or slower (increasing battery life).
The only phones on the market that prevent you from blocking their spyware and from removing their bloatware are the iPhones. The Apple Store's software is also so full of security holes that you have to "jailbreak" your phone so you can load safer and more dependable software form non-Apple sources. Forbes did a study of over 1,000 official and non-official apps for the iPhone and found that Apple Store apps were many times more likely to leak your data and your location than the supposedly illegal third-party apps.
Lastly, when new versions of Android are made available, they are pushed out OTA (over the air) to upgrade your existing Android phones. With Apple, you have to buy a new model to get significant operating system upgrades. My S4 started out with Android Gingerbread (v 4.2), upgraded itself through 4.3 and a variety of KitKat versions (up through 4.4.4) and finally to Lollipop (Android 5.0). All without costing me a cent or requiring a phone upgrade.
If I can do ANYTHING to enlighten iPhone users to how they are being shortchanged, both in cost and capabilities, I will do so. Personal choice is all well and good - and I respect a person's right to choose. But, it should be an
INFORMED choice.