I like how
@Rodafina said that you're engaged in "harm reduction" by having the propensity for gaming to become a compulsive habit but having that be the "lesser of two evils" in comparison to compulsive alcohol consumption.
Substituting one addiction for another isn't anything new. Heavy nicotine addiction has always seemingly gotten a "pass" in traditional 12 step programs, for example in the way it's not been considered an addiction in that "circle" that needs to be addressed or it's considered "harm reduction" for many addicts with severe addictions to other drugs.
Also, being a "functional addict" of certain drugs is nothing new. Would it be better if such people had no addictions at all? Yes. In my opinion it would also be better if people who need to use habit forming/addictive pharmaceuticals had no such need for them either.
The musician David Crosby was known to battle severe drug and alcohol addictions for a large portion of his adult life. In his later years he controlled this by being a "functional" cannabis user. He developed a habit and routine where he would not use cannabis during the day because he needed to accomplish tasks, get work done, etc and then he would smoke cannabis in the evenings. This "functional addiction" of harm reduction in relation to his overall history and propensity of drug use worked to keep him from sliding back into his previous drug use.
He didn't "beat himself up" about using cannabis daily as a failure to resist any and all forms of addiction. It's my opinion that the "all or nothing" approach of traditional chemical dependency models (except caffeine and nicotine) just doesn't work for everyone. It does for some people and for others with severe addictions it's likely a "do or die" issue with no other options. For those that can't function under an "all or nothing" approach to chemical dependency, the anxiety, guilt and shame of the idea: "I can't be addicted to anything or I'm a complete failure." can cause a person harm in their life in a different but still significant way.
I have to think that in the not too distant future the view of "functional addicts" will change to be more tolerant, compassionate and perhaps even supportive of people who respond best to this approach.
@Metalhead, you may be just one of those people in relation to gaming by your own admission.
All the best, brother.