I had an epiphany about all of this while I was working on some writing the other day.
We autistic people tend to be very literal . . . but does anyone really think about what this literalism creates? Please follow my ideas for a moment.
There is a way of being passive-aggressive called "malicious compliance." Malicious compliance is when a kid gets an assignment from his history teacher to write a letter home from a fictional 19th century Chinese railroad worker, and the kid complies by having his friend from Hong Kong translate the letter into Cantonese, and hands a letter into his teacher that's written in the Chinese alphabet.
We autistic people take things literally, and I've begun to wonder if this is interpreted by our employers as being passive-aggressive, and/or as malicious compliance.
The philosopher Aaron James wrote a book outlining his theory of assholes, and to be an asshole, three criteria need to be met:
1) A sense of entitlement.
2) The person is shielded from sanctions and push-back from the consequences of his sense of entitlement. This protection can be because of circumstances (you knock someone down in a crowd and disappear by mingling into a mass of people), or it can be because of your poisition (a CEO who sexually harrasses a female janitor).
3) This sense of entitlement (and acting on it) is an ingrained, basic quality of the person in question, and not something than manifests itself once in a great while.
It occurred to me that our autistic literalism may create the idea that we're passive-aggressive assholes, and nobody wants to be a friend with an asshole, nobody wants to work with an asshole, nobody wants to go out on a limb for an asshole, and--most of the time--nobody wants to have sex with an asshole.
This creates a real dilemma, as I believe that our literalism comes from two sources:
1) Sensory issues. Mahrabian--in 1967--discovered that human communication is 55% tone of voice, about 38% body language, and only about 7% comes from what is being said. Sensory issues with sound obscure 55%, our problems with body language filter out 38%, which only leaves us with the 7% to work with . . . and people wonder why we're so literal.
2) Social blindness. If we don't understand nuance, then--again--we become very literal.
So, I believe that this literalism causes us to be perceived as assholes by the rest of the world, as this literalism resembles the passive-aggressive behavior of someone who is being maliciously compliant.
I've run into this myself any number of times.
When I was a kid, my mother screamed in my face while shaking me back and forth that I was never to talk to strangers.
Also, I was told that just because someone else does something that's wrong . . . it's not an excuse for me to do something wrong (like doing drugs, or shoplifting). I'm expected to do the right thing even when other people are in the wrong.
I would then get punished because I refused to talk with or acknowledge a substitute teacher in school, because she was a stranger.
My parents would yell at me because I could see all the other kids talking to her, but--in my mind--just because the other kids were doing something wrong, it doesn't mean that I can do something that's wrong.
So (in this example), my autism caused me to be seen as an asshole (as defined by Aaron James).
I wonder if this is why we have problems with relationships, why we are bullied, why we are chronically unemployed, and why we have issues with education and schooling.
We autistic people tend to be very literal . . . but does anyone really think about what this literalism creates? Please follow my ideas for a moment.
There is a way of being passive-aggressive called "malicious compliance." Malicious compliance is when a kid gets an assignment from his history teacher to write a letter home from a fictional 19th century Chinese railroad worker, and the kid complies by having his friend from Hong Kong translate the letter into Cantonese, and hands a letter into his teacher that's written in the Chinese alphabet.
We autistic people take things literally, and I've begun to wonder if this is interpreted by our employers as being passive-aggressive, and/or as malicious compliance.
The philosopher Aaron James wrote a book outlining his theory of assholes, and to be an asshole, three criteria need to be met:
1) A sense of entitlement.
2) The person is shielded from sanctions and push-back from the consequences of his sense of entitlement. This protection can be because of circumstances (you knock someone down in a crowd and disappear by mingling into a mass of people), or it can be because of your poisition (a CEO who sexually harrasses a female janitor).
3) This sense of entitlement (and acting on it) is an ingrained, basic quality of the person in question, and not something than manifests itself once in a great while.
It occurred to me that our autistic literalism may create the idea that we're passive-aggressive assholes, and nobody wants to be a friend with an asshole, nobody wants to work with an asshole, nobody wants to go out on a limb for an asshole, and--most of the time--nobody wants to have sex with an asshole.
This creates a real dilemma, as I believe that our literalism comes from two sources:
1) Sensory issues. Mahrabian--in 1967--discovered that human communication is 55% tone of voice, about 38% body language, and only about 7% comes from what is being said. Sensory issues with sound obscure 55%, our problems with body language filter out 38%, which only leaves us with the 7% to work with . . . and people wonder why we're so literal.
2) Social blindness. If we don't understand nuance, then--again--we become very literal.
So, I believe that this literalism causes us to be perceived as assholes by the rest of the world, as this literalism resembles the passive-aggressive behavior of someone who is being maliciously compliant.
I've run into this myself any number of times.
When I was a kid, my mother screamed in my face while shaking me back and forth that I was never to talk to strangers.
Also, I was told that just because someone else does something that's wrong . . . it's not an excuse for me to do something wrong (like doing drugs, or shoplifting). I'm expected to do the right thing even when other people are in the wrong.
I would then get punished because I refused to talk with or acknowledge a substitute teacher in school, because she was a stranger.
My parents would yell at me because I could see all the other kids talking to her, but--in my mind--just because the other kids were doing something wrong, it doesn't mean that I can do something that's wrong.
So (in this example), my autism caused me to be seen as an asshole (as defined by Aaron James).
I wonder if this is why we have problems with relationships, why we are bullied, why we are chronically unemployed, and why we have issues with education and schooling.
Last edited: