Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
I saw this program some time ago and it's part of the reason I believe that Autistics only struggle in society, according to the Triad of Impairments, because it's society that thinks and acts in rigid fashion; the rigid thinking and behavior of autistics is as observed by NT's, but may, in fact, be a defence against a confusing world.
I see this more plainly with people with AS/HFA, simply because we can communicate our thoughts and feelings so much more clearly. I will, though, admit to limited experience with 'my own kind'.
I wonder.. if education, from parenting to schools to work environments, were flexible enough to encompass nontypical learning styles, would more low-functioning autistics be productive members of society?
I personally have built and run my own business for 20 years.. I've proven I'm capable of being successful and productive, yet I still struggle to learn unless instruction is clearly explained and logical.
Maybe this comes down to societies predilection toward sweeping its problems under the carpet, rather than actually dealing with them?
Actually, my question is tremendously unpopular. As the old saying goes: "The dancer blames the floor" sometimes more justifiably than others. Which brings us to Asperger's as a condition rather than a pathology, and Aspies as the blameless innocent victims of a flawed evil and profoundly corrupt society. But is that a scientific hypothesis? And what would be the experiment with conditions of refutation?
Again: It has long been observed how gifted students amongst their own true gifted peers, suddenly and mysteriously no longer require the great blessed boon of socialization! But is such the case for Aspies? No, alas it is not. Thus, it appears that there is a detriment inherent to Asperger's, and not just the social problem of bullying which is, after all, the abuse and exploitation of the disorganized by the well organized. Bullies are as thick as thieves, but Aspies cannot or will not organized even with one another, unlike, for example, the manic depressives who have such clout! Giftedness offers clues to an improved paradigm of social integration. Asperger's apparently does not. Disappointing, as I had entertained interest in and hopes for what has been called: Aspie candor. But I have yet to witness much of that personally, but more often quite the opposite: denial and hypersensitivity.
Know more at: FoolQuest.com
Warning: The site may come down pursuant to a terms of service warning (censorship) that I am still trying to resolve. If that actually happens, I am all set to change webhosts and be back up again as quickly as possible.
Do you really believe that the causes of Aspie disorganization are so entirely strategic and circumstantial rather than howsoever pathological and inherent to the condition?
One thing I can't quite seem to reconcile in my head. AS often includes impaired executive function. But AS can also inherently include high SQ (systemizing quotient). The description you quoted from Atwood's book seems contradictory to characteristics of someone with high SQ. In fact, one of my strengths is being able to think outside the box to come up with other ways to approach a problem. And when that doesn't work, I think of something else. If anything, in my experience anyway, I've been less confined to a lock-step problem-solving box than the NTs around me. What are your thoughts?
Interesting, DogwoodTree. Other aspects of executive functioning include multitasking and remembering verbal instructions. Maybe it depends on one's specific neurology?
How about Bob Aydeeaichdee?
"Impaired executive function can include a difficulty considering ALTERNATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING strategies. Harold Stone, a man with Asperger's Syndrome, explained to me that the thinking of children and adults with Asperger's Syndrome can be represented by a train on a singular track. If it is the right track, the child will quickly arrive at the destination, the solution to the problem. However, I have observed that children with Asperger's Syndrome can be the last to know if they are on the wrong track, or to recognize that there may be other tracks to the destination. Thus, there may be a problem with flexible thinking, one of the characteristics of impaired executive function. Typical (NT) children and adults are able to react quickly to feedback and are prepared to change strategies or direction. Their vehicle of thought is not a train but a four-wheel drive vehicle that easily changes direction and is able to go 'off-road'."
I submit, however, that, as always with such tests, some of the questions are ambigous to us literally minded buggers .. and, as always, the question of lack of true understanding of the condition from an NT perspective comes into play.
I do feel and find, however, that I am far more of an emotive and empathetic individual than such results make out.
Please, love, don't ever take my comments as any kind of personal criticism, just that of the clinicial system generally .. Besides, I love taking these tests.. I'll eventually devise my own and some of the questions will involve ones involvement with SciFi escapeism, such as StarTrek and Dr. Who.. much overlooked and, in my view, important diagnostic criteria
I get you here and it's a problem I sometimes come up against myself, but generally, I find I'm able to consider multiple theories or tracks simultaneously.. further incoming data reduces the number of tracks, leaving me with fewer options for a solution, until I arrive at a terminus.. Also, if it proves to be the wrong termimus, I can backtrack and follow another approach.
Ok, DogwoodTree, I've just done the test and:
My EQ score is 26; Baron-Cohen suggests that this means I have a lower than average ability for understanding how other people feel and responding appropriately. My Systemizing Quotient is 47. Suggests that this means I have an average ability for analysing and exploring a system.
Now, in reality, I appear to impress people with how much I can 'pick up' on them emotionally, yet the scores suggest differently.. and I really mean, I get things about people they weren't aware, by the surprise on their faces, that they were giving out!
I submit, however, that, as always with such tests, some of the questions are ambigous to us literally minded buggers .. and, as always, the question of lack of true understanding of the condition from an NT perspective comes into play.
I do feel and find, however, that I am far more of an emotive and empathetic individual than such results make out.
Please, love, don't ever take my comments as any kind of personal criticism, just that of the clinicial system generally .. Besides, I love taking these tests.. I'll eventually devise my own and some of the questions will involve ones involvement with SciFi escapeism, such as StarTrek and Dr. Who.. much overlooked and, in my view, important diagnostic criteria
Not sure if I would want to meet him, but if I had and could foresee the future, so actually, lets say he is STILL alive, because I do not believe in reading the future lol I would say that for all the hard work he achieved, how does he feel with the complete idiotic, stupid attitude of so called professionals, who deemed that aspergers no longer exist, as a condition, and yet, some professionals STILL diagnose ones with apsegers. Honestly, do you not think: Mr Aspergers, that they need help themselves?
I would then thank him for his dedication and helping me to realise that I am not quite the alien I used to think I was, even if nt's behaviours cause me to feel alien like still.