<< last minute edit before I leave (important cricket match to see, only one sports bar in town showing it
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
While I understand the people who see a restraining order as a major step, given the context there's no real difference between LC and a restraining order.
You
must make it absolutely clear to your parents they
may not disrupt your life, including uninvited contact of any kind, and that they
will not do these things because you're prepared to actively enforce your requirements.
So the
psychological side is fixed - it
has to happen.
Everything else is implementation details. These should be chosen based on
your needs, preferences, and wishes, not your parents'.
Something to consider: in a context like this, deferral is a decision. It's better to actively choose a path, and stay with it, than put it off - i.e. "wait xxx time units and then reassess" is better than an unfocused delay.
If you want my opinion, LC (tell them, then do it) is the
minimum, but it's the hardest to execute ...
because of what they've done in the past. Other options on the list below only exist because the relationship has already failed due to their actions.
This doesn't make "defer/reassess at time X" wrong any more than it makes a restraining order wrong.
The point is that any "karmic imbalance" in the medium-term result isn't on
you.
In a sense you
cannot make a mistake as such. The mistakes are all in the past, and it sounds like you weren't the one making (most of) them.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Back to the re-post post ....
Your comments about your fiance, and the fact that you've seen it already, are enough for me to re-post.
I've detuned the part about your fiance, since it seems they can be trusted.
Here's a slightly modified version.
By the way the "algorithm" has two purposes:
* A set of possible options from "softer but harder to execute" to "more definite but easier to execute". It's not really complete, but this kind of thing can make decisions easier.
* The 100% part is a reminder of something I used a scenario for in an earlier post:
don't decide on a course of action unless you know you + fiance can actually execute it. Your parents
will want to push back. Violating a restraining order once or twice won't get them put in jail, so they may do it.
Here it is - there's probably some duplication now:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
@autism-and-autotune
You can't borrow power from a forum, nor shift responsibility to it.
Start by accepting that
you have to make this decision, and that it's not going to be conveniently reversible.
Your plan is to permanently change your relationship with your parents. Own it.
You should ask your fiance to actively support you: share the decision, and participate in executing your plan.
You need to be able to count on this person to support you, and:
1. They must never, for any reason, on any topic at all, negotiate with your parents behind your back
2. They must actively help you if (probably when) your parents do something crazy.
<< some unnecessary section removed >>
Surely you can get the courts to rescind the restarting order later?
If so, there's no downside to just doing it.
Either way, you have some choices. An algorithm:
If you know, 100%, that you're strong enough to handle being in occasional contact (LC) with them, do it.
Otherwise, if you know, 100%, that you can deliver an ultimatum restricting their behavior, and enforce it, do it.
They'll test you though, so be absolutely certain you can enforce your rules.
Otherwise, if you know, 100%, you can handle a single meeting with them explaining that you
will obtain a restraining order due to their past behavior, have the meeting out of politeness, then do it.
Note: this is not a meeting for renegotiation, or listening to them whine. Those are "LC" options
Otherwise, get the restraining order ASAP, and rather than talking to your parents, use a lawyer.
A rule in conflict: if you can, don't
signal your strike, and
win with one strike if you can.
Negotiating first is for movies (where the drama is the
point) and people who aren't playing to win.
Note that this is "guy-style talk":
100% isn't "more than 80%", it isn't "it feels like it could be 100%", it isn't "I want it to be 100%".
If you have any doubt whatsoever at any level of that algorithm, move down to the next option.