• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Literalism and situational interpretation

I get that "tone" thing so often....... either I come across as arrogant or aggressive. Then no one replies at all to what I feel I actually said and I'm like "what just happened?" so often I am left wondering why other people dont just focus more on the content, THE CONTENT people!
That's the thing, social communication is often about conveying emotional states, not words. Often the words are just a vehicle for that emotional message (ememe) and not even important.

That's a major difference in the way we tend to communicate versus the way most other people do - we use words, but they use ememes - emotional messages or words that convey a second social meaning which they consciously, or subconsciously, interpret. It's the norm. So even when what we say contains no such message, they are looking for one and may well interpret one that wasn't there or intended.
 
Last edited:
My greatest difficulty is when I ask a direct question designed to elicit a specific yes or no, or factual response, and then get an indirect reply. This leaves me none the wiser and I have to ask my question again.
Yes, yes, yes! I get this often with my mom. How can my mom give me a story when I just asked if she wanted chicken for dinner? Is she talking about that ham dish from 6 years ago because she wants ham? Chicken, mom, yes or no?

I admit my as my frustration level rises so does my tone. I probably sound arrogant or condesending. I really am just feeling overwheled by non directional information.
 
I just remembered an incident that happened a long time ago that made me feel like I was in kindergarten.

I was applying to a beauty school and had to complete an in person interview. During the interview the administrator had me cut out the outline of a hand from paper. The intention, I now knoe, was to anylize my dexterity. But at the time I was hyper focused on following instructions. The outline had a dot at the start of the wrist, about 1/3 of the way up the paper and the words "start here". I was perplexed by this as I really didn't know what they wanted me to do. So I stared at this dot for a full minute.

The easiest thing to do was to cut into the paper at the edge, but if I did that I would not be starting on the dot as instructed. So I decided they wanted to check my problem solving skills. I then had a choice. I could fold the paper at the dot and make a little nick to insert the scissors, but the nick would not be on the dot precisely. In the end I stabbed into the paper eith the scisdors through the middle of the dot to begin my outline cut.

I completed cutting out the hand outine but as I got to the wrist area again, the outline ended and did not vivisect the wrist from the rest of the paper to complete the hand cutout. So I just left the hand cutout attached to the paper at the wrist.

Perhaps literalism is my super power? Ha ha!

I think this is an excellent example of how NT’s instructions can often make a task much more difficult to complete than it would be if they just stuck to asking for the outcome they wanted.

They could have said ‘cut out this shape’ and you probably would have been a whole lot less confused.

I have this feeling all of the time about almost everything relating to instructions on how to do things. Almost inevitably, the ‘how’ part is the absolute antithesis of the way I work best. They just said what they wanted to achieve, they’d probably get a better answer.
 
That's the thing, social communication is often about conveying emotional states, not words. Often the words are just a vehicle for that emotional message (ememe) and not even important.

That's a major difference in the way we tend to communicate versus the way most other people do - we use words, but they use ememes - emotional messages or words that convey a second social meaning which they consciously, or subconsciously, interpret. It's the norm. So even when what we say contains no such message, they are looking for one and may well interpret one that wasn't there or intended.

… and, in my experience, they often can’t or won’t explain what they mean. It’s almost taken as unreasonable facetiousness to even ask.

The reason I know how to do social quite well now (better, in some ways, than many of my NT acquaintances) is because I had someone at a previous job put some serious time into explaining what people were probably thinking when they said certain things, and how to respond. I owe that person a great deal.

That said, it’s also likely that my masking so well is what has led to my being continually exhausted for around a decade. So I suppose, on balance, it’s about 50/50 good and bad. LOL.

Most people won’t explain - and they definitely won’t answer the question ‘how do I come across?’ or ‘what kind of person do you think I am?’. So I feel like I’m left a bit blind, otherwise. The world often isn’t set up for us to actually manage to learn this stuff.

Oh, and I’m better at social stuff than a lot of the NT’s I know because I learned it as a skill - and because I don’t have that emotional subtext that affects how I interact with people. I don’t have grumpy moods or self-interested motives. I’m not dishonest, in general. Mostly, I’ve been told I’m a calming presence - even when I’m feeling overwhelmed - because I’m putting it on like a mask, not feeling it in myself.

Makes me a good manager - very emotionally level, very easy to build trust in. It’s ironic, really.
 
My interpretation of this would be that you didn't want to eat anything at all, because of the 'if' conditional clause, which introduces a hypothetical situation and not a real one.

Yes! Exactly!
That's exactly what I told her as well, that it was entirely a hypothetical statement.
At least someone understands! :)
 
i just finished having a discussion with my wife about visiting a friend a fellow Aspie we had planned to meet thier cottage until he send us a message they wi ll be at the main house she reads into a message information that is not there. I just told her we simply visit thier house change of plans stop. do not respond you will confuse both them and me
 

New Threads

Top Bottom