What a great reply, @Gerontius! Hope you're ok with my passing it along.
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Usually I can barely remember what I've written, so go on ahead with it--feel free to share, alter, do whatever. No worries.What a great reply, @Gerontius! Hope you're ok with my passing it along.
Learned helplessness ought to be banned. I do not like it when the victim card is played--it's bad for the family members being emotionally blackmailed, and it's bad for the person placing themselves in the role of victim. It's an awful form of self-abuse through which they terrorize those around them. (Clearly, I have some experience with family members like that.)There's always a fine line between Executive Dysfunction and "Weaponized Incompetence".
And some Aspies are inclined to do, or not do, things for which the consequences are severe, to the point of obvious and significant negative effects on their own lives.
IMO step one is a BS test.
The easy way to remember the testing principle: abusers who become enraged and smash stuff up somehow never smash their own things /lol.
The BS test is just to see if the kid takes care of things that matter to him. Your friend will know the answer already. The test is to contextualize it for her.
Important: the next step isn't to take away the few things that matter to him. He already has control through denial, inaction and refusal, and he won't let that go. So a "head-banging competition is out - push him and he'll happily go without washing (himself or the laundry) forever.
Your friend should plan an adult interaction.
Or, if she has been enabling him, you should plan one with her first.
BTW, "statistically" it's not unlikely she is contributing, but there's no data in your OP so I have no idea one way or the other. But if you look around here you'll see plenty of examples of "learned helplessness". That's another "fine line" that could have been be integrated into my first sentence. It's not easy to address, but nor is it impossible.
That's incredibly creative. Talking is a necessity. I can trace a ton of my problems to a deep loneliness. So--I take and go talk to random people.Perhaps a way of resolving part of the problem would be to do something like this...
As far as the chores go, for a time, perhaps his mother could say "ok, let's do the laundry and have a talk." So you are kinda associating something he feels the need to do (talking at length) and something he's reluctantly doing (laundry).
Maybe (as far as is possible) when he begins to talk say, "let's have a chat and do some chores..."
Essentially I'm thinking if he needs to get into what I describe as a verbal avalanche, by making "talk time" also "chores time" it may minimise the talking and maximize the chores.
I hope that makes some sense.
Maybe for a time they can do the chores together while he talks and slowly his mother can make an excuse to go do something else progressively earlier each time and hopefully leave him too it eventually.
Like a bit of psychological slight of hand?
I have held off in offering leverage-type advice until the question of severity has been answered. NT tactics should generally work for 1s, but less likely for 2s.Learned helplessness ought to be banned. I do not like it when the victim card is played--it's bad for the family members being emotionally blackmailed, and it's bad for the person placing themselves in the role of victim. It's an awful form of self-abuse through which they terrorize those around them. (Clearly, I have some experience with family members like that.)
Great suggestion--thanks! I'll pass it along!Essentially I'm thinking if he needs to get into what I describe as a verbal avalanche, by making "talk time" also "chores time" it may minimise the talking and maximize the chores.
...
Like a bit of psychological slight of hand?
I asked and his diagnosis as a child was Asberger's, but a few years ago when she took him to be retested the therapist said he doesn't have it anymore. Like, seriously??? Turns out he had just taken a psychology course and spent the whole time talking theory. He's exceptionally verbal--he just can't connect that talk to living! I think the therapist got schnookered & saw what he wanted to see, and completely disregarded the reality of what this kid's daily life can be like & the agony he has suffered at school and the job he was quickly dismissed from.I have held off in offering leverage-type advice until the question of severity has been answered. NT tactics should generally work for 1s, but less likely for 2s.
Yes--whatever it's called in getting from an idea to a completed action, my young friend really struggles with that. He always has, ever since I first knew him. I know a little about executive function--enough to know why my house looks like it does with all the stress I've been under--but not enough for it to be useful in this case. I'll add this to my read-up-on list for the weekend.In my ASD2 son's case, it really is not "weaponized incompetence." He really does have executive dysfunction even when it comes to causation/natural consequences, even more so toward human-imposed consequences.
That must have been tough to deal with. You said, "when he was young." Was he able to grow and adapt a healthier perspective of cause and effect over time?When he was young, we would take away a privilege when he did something he was not supposed to, but he would treat that as us being mean rather than the expected consequences of his misdeed. He was effectively incorrigible apart from us physically interfering with his bad actions.
If he bumped into a fixed object (like the stair post), he would smack it for having the audacity to strike him "unprovoked." His ASD3 sister has a better sense of simple causation than he does.
Outside of autism-competent services, autism (particularly ASD1) is a political football whose detractors accuse of over-diagnosis. It is quite common for such a diagnosis to be rescinded due to political & economic pressure. ASD1 is not pharmaceutically lucrative; there is no medicine for it, only for the the severe co-morbids accompanying ASD2 & 3.I asked and his diagnosis as a child was Asberger's, but a few years ago when she took him to be retested the therapist said he doesn't have it anymore. Like, seriously???
Basically, conventional negotiations. If you meet these conditions, I will do this in return...I have no idea what NT tactics are.
Not at all. He is clueless about how his bad decisions are the source of his constant financial & social woes. But since he has a rep payee, his shelter is assured. He has EBT, too, but he is not above selling his food so purchased to get the latest video game...You said, "when he was young." Was he able to grow and adapt a healthier perspective of cause and effect over time?
He willingly accepts credit or personal loans (for recreational purchases) with absolutely no forethought of how he might pay them back.Was he able to grow and adapt a healthier perspective of cause and effect over time?
Yeah, I don't know if it was rescinded so much as the state-appointed diagnostician didn't find evidence for it. (Me, dryly: he chose not to see what was right in front of him. I know I come off 'normal', his mom, maybe--to a point, but him, uh-uh. Everyone notices that he's different. In our small community, it kind of precedes him.)@GypsyMoth, you said that he had a diagnosis but it was recently rescinded. Was that recent enough that he can approach another counselor for a second opinion?
If he really is ASD, it will be harder on both mom & son if they do not have access to support services. Even more so if he is a 2 or 3.
@GypsyMoth,That IEP is important. It is prior evidence of his condition.