Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
This is to be expected. The question really is, what percentage of NTs have difficulty making friends compared to the percentage of autistic people who have difficulty making friends. Now, we have something to compare, and I am willing to bet the percentages are quite different.Experiences from both NTs, and adults on the Autism Spectrum can offer important dynamics in this disc. thread.
Otherwise, the average NT doesn't generally have challenges making friends at school, even if they are shy.
Yep I can confirm this, not as an NT ofc but because I was friends with a couple of NTs and I know the reason they stopped being my friend was more on them actually due to them moving away so it being harder to do things with them + them getting busy with their lives so even texting wasn't really feasible either.Many NTs have trouble making friends or maintaining friendships throughout their lives. Shyness, social anxieties, low self-esteem, lack of free time and other factors get in their way.
This still exists where I am. Probably motivated by the fact that 7 kids or more is common around here and you just can't keep track of them all or have enough devices for them all and hey you have plenty. I've seen children as young as 5 riding bikes on the freeway.Having been around for a while, gen-X, here, I have seen quite a dramatic shift in society over the past 50+ years. In a world where, as children, we really were not allowed in the house, and were pretty much forced outside, no personal phones, computers, or even more than 3 TV channels, we were all sort of obligated to be social creatures. The neighborhood kids always had a baseball, football, kickball game, riding bikes for miles away from home exploring, playing out in the woods, fishing, swimming at the public pool, whatever. You got up first thing in the morning, quickly ate a bowl of cereal, and were out the door by 8am, never seeing your parents until 5:30-6pm for dinner or when the streetlights came on.
Maybe "the pendulum" is swinging back. I hope.This still exists where I am. Probably motivated by the fact that 7 kids or more is common around here and you just can't keep track of them all or have enough devices for them all and hey you have plenty. I've seen children as young as 5 riding bikes on the freeway.
Nah, just the culture here. I think it's mostly the logical outcome of the logistics of having far too many kids to helicopter parent. 3 is probably the max before you start giving up control.Maybe "the pendulum" is swinging back. I hope.
Yeah, when we were kids, most families had at least 3 children, but closer to 4-5 on average. Of course, most parents were done having kids before 30. My mom was done having 5 children by the time she was 24, and that wasn't uncommon, at all.Nah, just the culture here. I think it's mostly the logical outcome of the logistics of having far too many kids to helicopter parent. 3 is probably the max before you start giving up control.
I had my fifth at 25. I had 4 in 5 years from 17 to 21, then they were more spaced out from there. One at 25, one at 29 and my last at 33.Yeah, when we were kids, most families had at least 3 children, but closer to 4-5 on average. Of course, most parents were done having kids before 30. My mom was done having 5 children by the time she was 24, and that wasn't uncommon, at all.
Now-a-days, there's been a transition to a priority for women to receive a university education, get her life organized, then start looking for a mate. Too each their own, not judging, it's just different. Countries all over the world are experiencing population decline. It's good to hear that there are still places where there are large families.
Things have changed dramatically in just a few generations, faster than us humans have had the ability to adapt effectively. My mom grew up on a farm and had 9 siblings. My mom had 4 children, and we also grew up on a farm. The days of family farms are dwindling. None of us are farmers and we all went to college and graduated with bachelors or masters degrees. We generally are better of financially than our parents, although farmers can sometimes have a high net worth, but cash poor with most assets tied up in land and machinery. I am the only one who has not married and does not have children. Growing up on a farm, we started helping out with chores at young ages and spent a significant amount of time working. But our parents also emphasized the importance of school and other things outside of the farm.Yeah, when we were kids, most families had at least 3 children, but closer to 4-5 on average. Of course, most parents were done having kids before 30. My mom was done having 5 children by the time she was 24, and that wasn't uncommon, at all.
Now-a-days, there's been a transition to a priority for women to receive a university education, get her life organized, then start looking for a mate. Too each their own, not judging, it's just different. Countries all over the world are experiencing population decline. It's good to hear that there are still places where there are large families.
On the other hand, if we all waited until we could afford children, we would never have children. No one is really ready to have children, nor can afford them. You simply do what is needed and adjust. <Rant> There's a lot of very low income families having children, yet, for example, my son and daughter-in-law, making an easy $300,000+ a year (both lead engineers, student loans paid off) are constantly whining and complaining that having a home and children is just too cost prohibitive. My wife and I are like, seriously? We raised you boys on about $75,000, with a house, and two vehicles. We just went without for many years, but you kids are wanting to maintain a certain lifestyle and then complain that you don't have any time or money left over to afford a home and children. Well, surprise, surprise! Yes, I have seen the cost of living graphs over the years, but the math still doesn't add up. Seems to me they can live on one of those incomes alone and still have the other income to have a home, investments, and children. Groceries, utilities, vehicles, homes, etc. are just as expensive for us older folks, price inflation effects us too, our wages have not caught up with the cost of living either, we just know how to manage our lifestyle and money better.Things have changed dramatically in just a few generations, faster than us humans have had the ability to adapt effectively. My mom grew up on a farm and had 9 siblings. My mom had 4 children, and we also grew up on a farm. The days of family farms are dwindling. None of us are farmers and we all went to college and graduated with bachelors or masters degrees. We generally are better of financially than our parents, although farmers can sometimes have a high net worth, but cash poor with most assets tied up in land and machinery. I am the only one who has not married and does not have children. Growing up on a farm, we started helping out with chores at young ages and spent a significant amount of time working. But our parents also emphasized the importance of school and other things outside of the farm.
Today, I don't see how anyone could afford to have a family of more than 4 kids. It has always been a challenge to raise children, but it seems harder than ever today with technology and with both parents generally having careers. Plus, sports are no longer about just having fun and making friends, but seriously competitive at young ages. Parents having to make major time commitments in these kids activities. I think the pendulum has swung too far in the emphasis on career and we have forgotten the strength, value, happiness, and sense of value that comes with traditional families.