Physics theory Expansion and contraction of the universe

[apsie]

Hi
Sorry guys I put some nice posts for both of you don't know if you saw them before I pulled them. But after thinking on it for a little I decided to opted for safety over pride, can burn me at the stake if you wish probably deserve it. Some of my post stuff is looking like its going viral didn't expect that and am getting nervous, know that allot of you are real savant heavies didn't expect to get noticed so much. Would love to play, kills me not to get to talk about it, but things are get a little hairy over here not sure how bad it is yet. My stuff is not as nice mathamaticlly, as other models it is however accurate enough on lower end to get me in trouble on direct applications...you can fill in the blancks.
Sorry for coming in off thread saw just the stuff on Big bang on side of main page other day. Have personal grudge against certain theories, lack of logic drives me nuts, my Auspie thing.

I do not want to burn you at a stake.
Its a shame you can't share more, pherhaps on a later date?
I've attempted to map out some theories visually, like wallpaper with layers and from that perspective I've seen some big holes in theories to, holes that are the same across the board.
Lack of logic is my bane to, as some here already know.

 

[I am that which I am]

Aww that is too bad I missed that. There is always PM if you are comfortable. I can definitely understand how a lack of logic can drive you nuts it also bothers me. I am interested in knowing more but I do like to discuss it. I can understand that certain things are controversial. Some theories are controversial in every area of research and unfortunately not everyone comes to it with an open mind. I am quite a movie buff and often reference films: I do not know if you have seen it but the film "Dark matter" shows how close minded some scientists can get, which is a great shame. I faced some similar issues in my area as well. For example I have a simple theory that explains dementia, alzheimers and other aging disorders but if I were to ever come out with it I would certainly be kicked out of the university I work at (oh the irony). While saying the last sentence I am checking to make sure I am a ghost online. There are always some blanks to fill in. The important thing is that it provides an experimental direction where we can test a theory and learn more about the universe or area of study. That is what is important in science it's that theories are tested and constantly evolve to approach a better understanding of the area of study. Theories should be challenged and the general thoughts and assumptions others make should be acknowledged and clearly laid out. Otherwise we might go in the wrong direction for decades only for someone brilliant to come along and challenge it. But this very intelligent person, who might be right or at least closer to the truth, must persevere and be courageous as well. I was just interested to know whether or not my idea was good, perhaps I should make a video on youtube to try to explain it. I figured I might remind people of some limitations. Like the fact that we can only measure the here and now and some of the past, so what is really happening might elude us.

In case it was not clear I said the tread went a tad off topic since we started discussing the human capacity to understand a complex universe, which was not quite my intent. But it happens, I got a bit side tracked as well. My main point is that we should be aware of our limitations and assumptions. We cannot measure the expansion of the universe over a million years in the future and this might be quite a flaw.

 

[Spiller]

No need to apologise for presenting your views, debate would be nothing without counterpoint.

Couldn't agree more! Debate is fun!

Resulting to magic because we can not yet explain does not make magic valid.

I suppose it depends on how one would define 'magic'.
Our 21st century idea of technology would be viewed as magic by a man living 1000 years ago, though it is effective for our present time. Yet the insights of meditation or the effeciveness of Reiki healing, disciplines 1000's of years old, may be regarded as magic by science, yet are no less effective now than they ever were.
It's interesting to me that viewpoints can be so interchangeable, so equal, no matter our various backgrounds, knowledge, experience and era.. does that mean that we still have only the tiniest glimpse of the Whole?
Seems quite Taoist to me..

 

[apsie]

The most plausible and probably scientific explenation I can provide for things like Reiki healing being effective, is that humans can be taught to believe anything.
Sugar placebo's work, yet they are sugar. They even work (less) on people when they know they're taking placebos.
Thats what I call magic.
One can't explain something, and has to little knowledge of science and the facts, and almost instantly people graps at spiritualism.
Then one can go on a rationalizing spree, seeking conformation with a narrow vieuw (understandable in some cases because one can't know everything).
Allot of these magical healing things work, because even if they do not people will still believe they do.

It is something that can be found in every religion or spiritual ritualistic practice.
Repetition of rituals works, no matter what they are.
However, that does not make them true.
People believe what they need to/want to believe at any given point, even if its not the truth and they know it.

I'm not saying one is stupid or blind for believing in whatever.

 

[Spiller]

The most plausible and probably scientific explenation I can provide for things like Reiki healing being effective, is that humans can be taught to believe anything.
Sugar placebo's work, yet they are sugar. They even work (less) on people when they know they're taking placebos.

I completely agree with you as to the effectiveness of placebos and humans readiness to believe in anything, however, as Einstein said:
'The only source of knowledge is experience'.
And:
'Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one'
That one's rather Buddhist, I think
I feel that neither of us are wrong, we just have different experience.. what an incredibly diverse universe we're fortunate enough to live in, my friend

 

[Maelstrom]

I will tell you this the structure of universe is very simple, took me a year to find that. Sorry you missed posts did answer everything. There are some astro physicists who lean my way, they tend to be the ones who work quietly on the hard stuff. Look up the term disjunction fields that will point you in right direction, my work is completely independent but there is some overlap.
If you want understand how my mind works I tend to sort stuff with empirical law or as I sometimes call it, natural law. These laws are self enforcing, cause and effect patterns, and pervade everything, science, nature, society, and religion. These laws are often missed on account of their long-term or subtle nature. One of these most active laws is the law of catastrophic re-alinement often missed because it lays dormant until last second. It is the principle of energy stored until it reaches critical mass, like a pile of sand that collapses at a certain height.