Now, it is ICD-11, which hasSome countries use the ICD...
- Autism without Cognitive Deficits &
- Autism with Cognitive Deficits.
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Now, it is ICD-11, which hasSome countries use the ICD...
Disagree, he said there was too much variability with autism spectrum to label it as ASD1, ASD2, or ASD3. It is like saying all autistic people are essentially the same. PDD-NOS and Asperger's both have some unique characteristics that need to be recognized and not lumped together with everyone else. I only saw him for the diagnosisIt's like if he is treating your Autism Spectrum Disorder as if it was a personality disorder, even though it's not a personality disorder.
Disagree, he said there was too much variability with autism spectrum to label it as ASD1, ASD2, or ASD3. It is like saying all autistic people are essentially the same. PDD-NOS and Asperger's both have some unique characteristics that need to be recognized and not lumped together with everyone else. I only saw him for the diagnosis
That depends on the year and the diagnosticianNow, it is ICD-11, which has
- Autism without Cognitive Deficits &
- Autism with Cognitive Deficits.
Disagree, he said there was too much variability with autism spectrum to label it as ASD1, ASD2, or ASD3. It is like saying all autistic people are essentially the same. PDD-NOS and Asperger's both have some unique characteristics that need to be recognized and not lumped together with everyone else. I only saw him for the diagnosis
You're not completely incorrect, again it's each diagnostician.Now I understand what you mean, I was wrong, I am sorry![]()
You're not completely incorrect, again it's each diagnostician.
In the uk nhs (socialist healthcare system )gps gave out antibiotics like sweets, now you are barely ever prescribed them, then again! if you are celine dion singer, your gp(md) might prescribe you anything! manufactured at any dose, it's down to the individual, in the 1960s everybody was kanners or aspergers which in the uk was very rarely diagnosed in the 60s, jump ahead to the 2000s very common place to be diagnosed,which is very strange(lower percentage of diagnoses in the 60s) with the reputation for english eccentricity(really autism)
That is pretty much exactly what I said. It is the DSM5 that lumps them all together except for support levels.Your doctor is kind of wrong, ASD Level 1 is different than ASD Level 2 and ASD Level 2 is different than ASD level 3. And just because the symptoms of levels of levels of ASD comes from the same the same disorder, that doesn't mean that autistic traits in different levels of support are the same exact symptoms and not all the therapy or social skills training are the same for everyone with ASD, and some people with ASD can take medication for reduced harmful repetitive behaviors to themselves or something others in rare situations.
That is pretty much exactly what I said. It is the DSM5 that lumps them all together except for support levels.
The issues being supported among the 2s & 3s are their co-morbid conditions that 1s do not have. Those co-morbids are the product of brain damage.The treatment for ASD with different levels of support are not the same either.
The issues being supported among the 2s & 3s are their co-morbid conditions that 1s do not have. Those co-morbids are the product of brain damage.
https://autlanders.blogspot.com/2019/07/autism-subtypes.html
You're not completely incorrect, again it's each diagnostician.
In the uk nhs (socialist healthcare system )gps gave out antibiotics like sweets, now you are barely ever prescribed them, then again! if you are celine dion singer, your gp(md) might prescribe you anything! manufactured at any dose, it's down to the individual, in the 1960s everybody was kanners or aspergers which in the uk was very rarely diagnosed in the 60s, jump ahead to the 2000s very common place to be diagnosed,which is very strange(lower percentage of diagnoses in the 60s) with the reputation for english eccentricity(really autism)
As a mute person with no social skills, I can confirm that I can make a sandwich and remember to take a shower.A mute person with no social skills might be better at cooking or keeping themselves clean, than someone who has a high IQ, who has adequate social skills/language ability and who has multiple degrees, for example.
Yes, but the ugliness of it all IMO is that all too often it reflects the same thing.That makes sense.
Yes, but the ugliness of it all IMO is that all too often it reflects the same thing.
That the professional medical community does not fully understand autism. Leaving us at times in a kind of "no-man's land".
Not only do they not understand it, but in my experience, most mental health professionals cannot recognize it even when it is thrown in their face.Yes, but the ugliness of it all IMO is that all too often it reflects the same thing.
That the professional medical community does not fully understand autism. Leaving us at times in a kind of "no-man's land".