• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Seriously stooped this low ugh

Forest Cat said:
Oh that's true. Forget what I said Mysterionz, listen to Judge. :)
Click to expand...

Forest Cat said:
Oh that's true. Forget what I said Mysterionz, listen to Judge. :)
Click to expand...

LOL...I still remember what it was like to be online without an anti-virus program or firewall. Though that period of time didn't last long. I still recall how indignant I felt about having to spend money to protect myself online. Hmmmmph! The times we live in......oy. :eek:
 
Last edited:
I’m confused. If you haven’t sent the guy any pictures, how have you stooped low? You also seem coyly amused by his request, so what do you mean by “beat the system”? Is there some reason you feel obligated to send a stranger partially-clothed photos of yourself?
 
If malicious compliance still interests this person, they will probably keep pestering. The best option would be to not reward them at all. Then they will move on.
 
Can you block the guy and not even respond to him at all? That's the best way to go about this.
 
Magna said:
Can you block the guy and not even respond to him at all? That's the best way to go about this.
Click to expand...
Yes I could but he got upset I blocked one of his friends for spamming my messages with questions about extraterrestrial takeover. I see nothing wrong with it, just the spamming of messages when I’m not online.
 
mysterionz said:
Yes I could but he got upset I blocked one of his friends for spamming my messages with questions about extraterrestrial takeover. I see nothing wrong with it, just the spamming of messages when I’m not online.
Click to expand...
I can provide screenshots in dms
 
mysterionz said:
Yes I could but he got upset I blocked one of his friends for spamming my messages with questions about extraterrestrial takeover. I see nothing wrong with it, just the spamming of messages when I’m not online.
Click to expand...

Anyone can get upset about anything. Does that mean a person should comply with something that's exploitive? What would you gain by giving this person, a complete stranger on the internet, a picture of you in your bra which I'm assuming would show your cleavage? You have no idea what the person will do with that picture once you'd send it to them. Isn't it possible the person might be a sexual predator?

If a complete stranger on the internet demands money from someone and says they'll be upset if the person doesn't comply, should the person give them money?

If a stranger you encountered in real life walked up to you and asked you to show them your bra and if you didn't they'd be upset and berate you, would you do it? I assume not. This isn't really any different.

Also, if you're concerned that if you don't comply that they'll spam your DM which would be annoying, is this site you're talking about moderated? If someone did that here they'd be rightly banned if reported, wouldn't they?
 
Last edited:
I'd just block them! But if you were wanting to indulge in some Malicious Compliance, then Photoshop a picture of yourself fully clothed wearing your hat so it looks like you are standing inside of one of the cups of the bra, think bra so big you could stand in it. Then block the guy and never look back :-)
 
Use this experience to outline all others. That if you receive a communication in which you cannot interpret their real intent to your own satisfaction, it's best to just let it slide. Above all, do not answer them in any way, as it just provides a potentially hostile party with your email address.

Though I must admit, it intrigues me that it's not really clear what this person was after, if anything at all. Whether actually based on projecting humor or prurient interest remains unclear without more details as to this person's connection ( or none at all) to the OP.

A clown? A secret admirer? A troll? Hard to say. Though IMO I'd think that had they asked you for a picture wearing a trapper hat and only a smile, you'd be in a better position to understand what this person's intentions really are, and an absolute need to avoid them as an obvious predator.
 
Last edited:
We all agree with the simplest answer. The person sounds like a perv (at the very least, comes across as immature - might be overtly misogynistic, though), and you shouldn't exploit yourself.

You alone teach people how to treat you by revealing what you will or won't put up with.
 
Judge said:
You mean a man with a lingerie fetish?
Click to expand...
No. I mean "grooming". Sexual predators work by doing things in stages/degrees. A woman who is compliant with sending a picture of herself in a bra now could mean she might be compliant with sending pictures that are more revealing later.
 
Magna said:
No. I mean "grooming". Sexual predators work by doing things in stages/degrees. A woman who is compliant with sending a picture of herself in a bra now could mean she might be compliant with sending pictures that are more revealing later.
Click to expand...
Gotcha. The use of "incremental tactics". A predator with a plan. A worst case scenario.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom