If it keeps them in bondage, you have only prolonged their suffering.
Charity includes accountability.
Do you mean that you believe charity should include accountability, or is there a definition which includes "accountability" as part of it?
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
If it keeps them in bondage, you have only prolonged their suffering.
Charity includes accountability.
Typical charities require proof of need; that one isn't pretending or obviously misspending their resources.Do you mean that you believe charity should include accountability, or is there a definition which includes "accountability" as part of it?
That sounds scary. Can you tell more?I was even almost kidnapped twice.
I don't know anything about online banking because my family never used it and I think it's pretty risky especially since i dont check it or keep track of the charges, and going to the post office has been a terrible experience before, had to go daily for a month until they gave me a phone number to call and told me where my money were. The state funds were supposed to go in the bank but they just ignored my hard work to get an account excerpt and hand it in to them in time. I hate bureaucracy.Two of mine are churches that I know and associate with. Their books are available to their congregations. The third has helped us in the past and has a very visible presence in our community.
If your on-line banking works like ours does, you can punch in the physical address to your favorite charity* as a payee and your bank will mail them a physical check whenever you tell them to. (That is free for us and it is great for record-keeping.)
*Call them first for details to make sure that you have their preferred address for donations.![]()
Yep I give 20% of my income to charity, automatic direct debit every month and I reassess which charities to donate to and how much each year.I'm not intending to imply you don't. I'm just genuinely curious. I certainly wouldn't be judging anyone. But do all of you who are talking about donating to charities actually donate regularly or is your argument more for the idea? And just to be clear, I'm not advocating for giving to the homeless in the place of giving to charities.
Here's where I disagree. I'll give 99 scammers my money if the 100th person is helped.
It's a beautiful attitude to have if slightly idealistic and naive one. The world needs more good people like you out there, maybe then it would be a little bit easier to get through.
Possibly my experiences made me cynical in this area but the truth is, the more money you give out, the more scammers make sure they get it. By trying to help those that need it and try to get it through begging, you may in fact fuel the business of people threatening, kidnapping and using those that already fell the most, just to gain even more bucks in easy ways. Is it worth it to be used by 99 people when there are alternatives that could ensure a higher percentage of the money/effort went to those in need?
I prefer voluntary work myself, although I would think about charity if I earned enough. Volunteered before in an animal shelter, soup kitchen and residential homes. Sad and poor places those were, with good animals/people that most often didn't deserve the treatment, lone and abandoned. There are few instances where you feel like you truly make a difference and seeing that small smile and wet eyes they have when I speak with them or serve them hot food is one of them.
At least, for one aspect of the person in front of you......my concern is with the person in front of me.
At least, for one aspect of the person in front of you...
Not compared to the image in the OP.If the issue has now gone from one aspect not being enough then we've changed the subject quite a bit.
Not compared to the image in the OP.
Giving selectively helps all three types [addicts, lazy, truly needy], because of its accountability factor. That is, it has minimum expectations of the recipient.For us to then never give any homeless people money because we need to keep the addict safe from themselves is a cruel and silly result.
I realise this thread has been revived but in regard to the original, and some earlier, posts I think I view things differently.
It's sad to see someone with an addiction, but I don't see them as being criminal or taking your $2 coin from other reasonable, law-abiding people. Addiction isn't just some nasty, criminal act that some people decide to enact on society...
And when you give (to someone in the street - not talking about registered charities) you can never be sure how they will use the money or what their deal is. But you know, when you give maybe it should come from the heart without so much freaking judgement. you might as well wish them the best, whatever situation they've found themselves in.