• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Time Isn't Real

Hmmmmm time is unity Sounds good but does it really describe what time is, in fact I would think the opposite. That time is NOT unity. With time there are cracks and crevices to how we experience it, like matter that meets us where we are, just particles moving forward whereas without time there is a lack
of forward momentum. So it's not experienced. Ugh. It is confusing. But also fascinated.
I think within the context of this sci-fi movie explanation, what she was explaining by "unity" is that without time, even matter does not exist. Without proof of existence, was it really there at all? Matter is not static. It is moving. We may perceive something as solid matter, the mountain, for example, but we know that over the many millennia, it may be turned to dust. If humans are not there to see it happen, was the mountain even there? Time gives proof to its existence. Time is the witness. What we perceive has nothing to do with it.

I am sure the writers of the movie script dove into someone's theoretical explanation of it and perhaps embellished a bit, but the basic concept makes sense.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom