Well, since they say they can't know what anybody with whom I socializied meant by anything they said to me or what they might have been responding to, particularly, as they don't know those people & weren't there at the time, they can't then advise on those things! It was obvious long ago that some part of the body language, facial expressions &/or tone of voice sometimes give misleading impressions but whatever it is making people think I'm rude , arrogant &/ or disrespectful doesn't seem to happen with the support workers. Oddly, although it's therefore been agreed, long ago, that any advisor for such problems simply has to be there at the time, there's never been such a person available.
The first hurdle is the probelmatic one, which is just gettting people to see that whatever words we're using to communicate with each other do need to actually mean something! You can't get to agree what that is when the first part isn't agreed. There's not really any question of what I mean by table/ chair/ radio, etc. Or, for the 'abstract' area, there's no question of what I mean with any maths terms, etc. It'd be like saying 2+2 can equal anything you like!
The first hurdle is the probelmatic one, which is just gettting people to see that whatever words we're using to communicate with each other do need to actually mean something! You can't get to agree what that is when the first part isn't agreed. There's not really any question of what I mean by table/ chair/ radio, etc. Or, for the 'abstract' area, there's no question of what I mean with any maths terms, etc. It'd be like saying 2+2 can equal anything you like!