Canismajoris
Hypergiant
Why not?I got 43.
What frustrates me is that I can't get my psychiatrist to recognise my Autism
My AQ is down there in my footer.
Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Why not?I got 43.
What frustrates me is that I can't get my psychiatrist to recognise my Autism
Why not?
My AQ is down there in my footer.
I got 39.
What's this mask thing?
What frustrates me is that I can't get my psychiatrist to recognise my Autism
Yes. For example, there's a question that asks whether you would prefer to go to the theatre or to a museum. Depends what theatre and what museum! Or the question about whether you like to read fiction or non-fiction. Yes and no - I do read non-fiction, but only sci fi or sometimes fantasy/advemture, not other genres.Did anyone who scored high have trouble answering the questions? My bf, who has lots of traits, had trouble answering some of the questions, saying they were too general or "it depends"; whereas I found it easy. It seemed he had trouble working out what some of the questions were actually getting at.
I scored 10.
Yes. For example, there's a question that asks whether you would prefer to go to the theatre or to a museum. Depends what theatre and what museum! Or the question about whether you like to read fiction or non-fiction. Yes and no - I do read non-fiction, but only sci fi or sometimes fantasy/advemture, not other genres.
36, but some of them I'm not sure how to answer because I've only ever known faking social competencyI took the test twice and scored between 41-43.
Did anyone who scored high have trouble answering the questions? My bf, who has lots of traits, had trouble answering some of the questions, saying they were too general or "it depends"; whereas I found it easy. It seemed he had trouble working out what some of the questions were actually getting at.
I scored 10.
I mentioned earlier in this thread some of my issues with the questions, but my issues are by no means just limited to those. For example:
"I am not very good at remembering phone numbers" First of all, the use of "very" as an adverb here is improper. Secondly, being good or bad at something like this is subjective. If I say I'm good at remembering phone numbers, that could mean I know my own phone number. Then presented with a list of phone numbers it turns out that I'm not good at remembering them in the least. Two people with a wide gap in their telephone number remembering abilities could answer the question in a conflicting spirit of the test.
Or it could be asking if I'm actually the Rainman? Hard to tell with such a vague criteria.
"I am often the last to understand the point of a joke." Huh? How could I possibly have enough information to answer this question?
"I don't usually notice small changes in a situation or a person's appearance" If I didn't notice...........It is nearly impossible to prove a negative for the same reason it's hard to answer a question with a negation.
This isn't to say that all the questions are so ambiguous. Some can be answered by direct experience. But there are so many that bother my need for precision.
Then there's the fact that they give you 4 options but the test is scored as if there are only 2. Pick either of the two on the right side you get the same point and the same is true if you pick either on the left. So why have the 4 options?