Au Naturel
Au Naturel
Autism as a common diagnosis was almost unheard of until the 90s. Prior to that, it was usually written off as eccentricity or nerdiness. Only ASD2 and 3 would ever be diagnosed and a lot of the time it would be treated as a generic retardation of unknown origin or assigned a diagnosis that didn't really fit.
When I was a kid (60s - 70s) it would be blamed on moral shortcomings. Lazy, disobedient, unsocial, selfish, cowardly, perverse, all those things. Practically speaking, where I lived, autism did not exist
But even today, parents will see the symptoms but it won't click. It never occurs to them their child might need help. Nobody wants to think their child is troubled. There's going into passive denial where they aren't even aware their thoughts are avoiding going in a particular direction and then there is active denial where you deny something despite the evidence. Humans are capable of spectacular levels of denial even when the evidence is obvious.
It is an unconscious coping mechanism and not something to hate them for.
When I was a kid (60s - 70s) it would be blamed on moral shortcomings. Lazy, disobedient, unsocial, selfish, cowardly, perverse, all those things. Practically speaking, where I lived, autism did not exist
But even today, parents will see the symptoms but it won't click. It never occurs to them their child might need help. Nobody wants to think their child is troubled. There's going into passive denial where they aren't even aware their thoughts are avoiding going in a particular direction and then there is active denial where you deny something despite the evidence. Humans are capable of spectacular levels of denial even when the evidence is obvious.
It is an unconscious coping mechanism and not something to hate them for.
Last edited: